Search for: "Marshall v. District of Columbia Government" Results 21 - 40 of 194
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Dec 2018, 9:30 pm by Bobby Chen
Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit. [read post]
1 Feb 2015, 10:35 am by Guest Blogger
  Among the most important briefs is the brief filed by the Virginiaattorney general and the attorneys general of twenty-one other states and the District of Columbia. [read post]
30 Aug 2022, 1:01 am by rhapsodyinbooks
In October 1945, during her second year at Columbia Law School, future United States Supreme Court Associate Justice Thurgood Marshall hired her as a law clerk. [read post]
30 Dec 2018, 6:28 am
Federal district courts decided against the government, but two U.S. courts of appeals issued temporary restraining orders against further publication pending appeal. [read post]
12 Jun 2017, 10:32 am by Francisco Macías
  New York:  Marshall Cavendish Benchmark, 2008. [read post]
12 May 2011, 1:23 pm
“We had in the 1990s addicts dying in the streets, hundreds, some years more than one a day,” Craig Jones, lawyer for the government of British Columbia, told the Supreme Court of Canada. [read post]
19 Dec 2018, 9:21 am by Stephen Wermiel
Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit, having been nominated less than two years earlier by Bush. [read post]
8 Nov 2010, 5:36 pm by Courtney
For the purposes of this section, any Act of Congress applicable exclusively to the District of Columbia shall be considered to be a statute of the District of Columbia. [read post]
23 Jun 2018, 8:15 am by Harry Graver
Similarly, the Supreme Court has upheld its appellate jurisdiction over territorial courts and courts for the District of Columbia, notwithstanding their respective lack of Article III status. [read post]
14 May 2010, 9:45 am
Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit (courthouse above right) in Al Bihani v. [read post]
22 May 2018, 5:20 am by Josh Blackman
Two centuries ago, Chief Justice John Marshall recognized in Marbury v. [read post]
6 Oct 2016, 3:30 am by Helen Norton
Rejecting a challenge to the District of Columbia’s examination for police officers that had the effect of disproportionately excluding African-American applicants, the Court held that the equal protection clause addresses only intentionally discriminatory government actions. [read post]
6 Jul 2012, 2:31 pm by David Kopel
NFIB returns Necessary and Proper doctrine to the originalist doctrine explicated by Chief Justice Marshall in McCulloch v. [read post]