Search for: "Marshall v. District of Columbia Government" Results 41 - 60 of 153
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Sep 2019, 5:49 am by Robert Brammer
District Court for the District of Columbia is a uniquely historically significant court. [read post]
22 Jan 2018, 11:34 am by Mark Walsh
Next, Roberts says that “Justice Ginsburg has our opinion today in Artis versus the District of Columbia. [read post]
11 Jun 2016, 10:19 am by David Kopel
Yolo, which had been brought by Alan Gura, the winning lawyer in District of Columbia v. [read post]
3 Mar 2015, 8:58 am
” Section 1304 provides that “the term ‘State’ means each of the 50 States and the District of Columbia. [read post]
25 Aug 2016, 3:00 am by Scott Bomboy
At last count, there were at least 74 National Historic Landmarks in the District of Columbia alone. [read post]
21 Jul 2020, 7:35 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
Oregon, which remains among the longest running federal district court cases in history. [read post]
23 Mar 2012, 5:00 am by Chris
Except for a time in local government as the District of Columbia’s Corporation Counsel, his entire career prior to the LDF directorship was at WilmerHale. [read post]
22 Jun 2017, 9:41 am by Mark Walsh
This case involves a notorious murder of a woman in the District of Columbia in 1984, and whether certain evidence the government had withheld from the defense was “material” under Brady v. [read post]
28 May 2020, 9:01 pm by Austin Sarat
”And, Justice Marshall was right to remind all of us that the right to vote “is the essence of a democratic society, and any restrictions on that right strike at the heart of representative government. [read post]
4 Dec 2018, 12:54 pm by Adam Feldman
Justices of the Supreme Court rarely give public comments on words or actions of members of the elected branches of the federal government. [read post]
6 Apr 2018, 4:00 am by Russell Spivak
The government then marshals evidence to support the conclusion that hostilities remain ongoing. [read post]
12 Jun 2020, 9:46 am by Rachel Brown, Coleman Saunders
” The Fourth Amendment precludes the government from conducting unreasonable searches and seizures, but, as the Supreme Court noted in Mapp v. [read post]
23 Jun 2017, 11:13 am by Mark Walsh
Ginsburg’s opinion sides with federal district court review, rejecting the government’s argument that mixed claims be split between a district court and the U.S. [read post]
6 Nov 2014, 11:44 am by Rory Little
District of Columbia, the Court’s 2008 Second Amendment “right to bear arms” decision, noted that short-barreled shotguns are “not typically possessed by law-abiding citizens for lawful purposes. [read post]