Search for: "Marshall v. District of Columbia Government"
Results 41 - 60
of 153
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Feb 2014, 9:00 am
Justice Marshall Rothstein and Mr. [read post]
19 Sep 2019, 5:49 am
District Court for the District of Columbia is a uniquely historically significant court. [read post]
22 Jan 2018, 11:34 am
Next, Roberts says that “Justice Ginsburg has our opinion today in Artis versus the District of Columbia. [read post]
1 Oct 2018, 1:34 pm
The second case today, Mount Lemmon Fire District v. [read post]
11 Jun 2016, 10:19 am
Yolo, which had been brought by Alan Gura, the winning lawyer in District of Columbia v. [read post]
3 Mar 2015, 8:58 am
” Section 1304 provides that “the term ‘State’ means each of the 50 States and the District of Columbia. [read post]
25 Aug 2016, 3:00 am
At last count, there were at least 74 National Historic Landmarks in the District of Columbia alone. [read post]
21 Jul 2020, 7:35 am
Oregon, which remains among the longest running federal district court cases in history. [read post]
23 Nov 2014, 12:23 pm
His right originates in an act of congress passed in February, 1801, concerning the district of Columbia. [read post]
23 Mar 2012, 5:00 am
Except for a time in local government as the District of Columbia’s Corporation Counsel, his entire career prior to the LDF directorship was at WilmerHale. [read post]
22 Jun 2017, 9:41 am
This case involves a notorious murder of a woman in the District of Columbia in 1984, and whether certain evidence the government had withheld from the defense was “material” under Brady v. [read post]
24 Dec 2011, 9:48 am
Dewey, 452 U.S. 594, 598 (1980), and Marshall v. [read post]
28 May 2020, 9:01 pm
”And, Justice Marshall was right to remind all of us that the right to vote “is the essence of a democratic society, and any restrictions on that right strike at the heart of representative government. [read post]
4 Dec 2018, 12:54 pm
Justices of the Supreme Court rarely give public comments on words or actions of members of the elected branches of the federal government. [read post]
6 Apr 2018, 4:00 am
The government then marshals evidence to support the conclusion that hostilities remain ongoing. [read post]
12 Jun 2020, 9:46 am
” The Fourth Amendment precludes the government from conducting unreasonable searches and seizures, but, as the Supreme Court noted in Mapp v. [read post]
17 Nov 2018, 11:21 am
Atkins and Scott v. [read post]
17 Nov 2018, 11:21 am
Atkins and Scott v. [read post]
23 Jun 2017, 11:13 am
Ginsburg’s opinion sides with federal district court review, rejecting the government’s argument that mixed claims be split between a district court and the U.S. [read post]
6 Nov 2014, 11:44 am
District of Columbia, the Court’s 2008 Second Amendment “right to bear arms” decision, noted that short-barreled shotguns are “not typically possessed by law-abiding citizens for lawful purposes. [read post]
