Search for: "Marshall v. District of Columbia Government" Results 41 - 60 of 195
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Jul 2020, 1:59 pm by Toby Heytens and Martine Cicconi
Heytens is solicitor general and Martine Cicconi is deputy solicitor general of the Commonwealth of Virginia, which filed an amicus brief on behalf of 15 states and the District of Columbia in support of the respondent in Trump v. [read post]
16 Jun 2020, 5:14 am by Richard Altieri, Margaret Taylor
They closed up Wall Street—the financial district of the world, and they had total domination. [read post]
12 Jun 2020, 9:46 am by Rachel Brown, Coleman Saunders
” The Fourth Amendment precludes the government from conducting unreasonable searches and seizures, but, as the Supreme Court noted in Mapp v. [read post]
28 May 2020, 9:01 pm by Austin Sarat
”And, Justice Marshall was right to remind all of us that the right to vote “is the essence of a democratic society, and any restrictions on that right strike at the heart of representative government. [read post]
26 Feb 2020, 9:41 am by Yi W. Stewart
Rather than acknowledging a fiduciary’s consent as “lawful consent” under the federal statute (id.; see Ajemian v Yahoo! [read post]
12 Nov 2019, 11:08 am by Gordon Ahl
The subcommittee will hear testimony from Lech Walesa, the former president of Poland; Melissa Hooper, the director of foreign policy advocacy at Human Rights First; Susan Corke, a senior fellow at the German Marshall Fund; Nate Schenkkan, the director for special research at Freedom House; and Matthias Matthijs, a senior fellow at the Council on Foreign Relations. [read post]
19 Sep 2019, 5:49 am by Robert Brammer
District Court for the District of Columbia is a uniquely historically significant court. [read post]
27 Jun 2019, 3:53 pm by Mark Walsh
Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit. [read post]
24 Jun 2019, 1:42 pm by Mark Walsh
Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit in National Parks & Conservation Association v. [read post]
12 Jun 2019, 7:26 am by Kate Shaw
Justice Stevens: Of course, some of the memories, the [District of Columbia v.] [read post]
12 Apr 2019, 2:35 pm by opseo
When determining whether Social Security income is taxable the government uses a formula that calculates the taxable amount. [read post]
6 Apr 2019, 9:29 am by Jeremy Gordon
” In a lengthy footnote, it addresses perhaps the most powerful case marshalled by McKeever in support of his position: Haldeman v. [read post]
27 Mar 2019, 1:00 am by Thaddeus Mason Pope, JD, PhD
Carl Coleman, Seton Hall University School of Law, Ethical Issues in Managing Vector-Borne Diseases Stacie Kershner, Georgia State University College of Law, Public Health Law and the E-Scooter Epidemic Noah Smith-Drelich, Columbia Law School, Food Tax Substitution Effects B. [read post]
19 Mar 2019, 7:24 am by Katherine Kelley
But there is still no such crime as “sextortion” at the federal level—and the federal government still does not keep data on incidents of sextortion. [read post]