Search for: "Marshall v. District of Columbia Government"
Results 61 - 80
of 195
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Feb 2012, 3:10 am
It wasn’t until District of Columbia v. [read post]
28 May 2020, 9:01 pm
”And, Justice Marshall was right to remind all of us that the right to vote “is the essence of a democratic society, and any restrictions on that right strike at the heart of representative government. [read post]
20 Sep 2010, 5:30 am
District Court for the District of Columbia. [read post]
4 Dec 2018, 12:54 pm
Justices of the Supreme Court rarely give public comments on words or actions of members of the elected branches of the federal government. [read post]
6 Apr 2018, 4:00 am
The government then marshals evidence to support the conclusion that hostilities remain ongoing. [read post]
12 Jun 2020, 9:46 am
” The Fourth Amendment precludes the government from conducting unreasonable searches and seizures, but, as the Supreme Court noted in Mapp v. [read post]
19 Jun 2023, 10:15 am
The panel also rejected the district court’s conclusion that the District of Columbia’s legislation extending the statute of limitations for appellant’s claims violated the separation of powers by altering a final judgment, and for the same basic reason: the District of Columbia did not “revive finally adjudicated claims” by amending the limitations period because the complaint had been dismissed without… [read post]
17 Nov 2018, 11:21 am
Atkins and Scott v. [read post]
17 Nov 2018, 11:21 am
Atkins and Scott v. [read post]
23 Jun 2017, 11:13 am
Ginsburg’s opinion sides with federal district court review, rejecting the government’s argument that mixed claims be split between a district court and the U.S. [read post]
24 Dec 2011, 9:48 am
Dewey, 452 U.S. 594, 598 (1980), and Marshall v. [read post]
6 Nov 2014, 11:44 am
District of Columbia, the Court’s 2008 Second Amendment “right to bear arms” decision, noted that short-barreled shotguns are “not typically possessed by law-abiding citizens for lawful purposes. [read post]
31 Dec 2020, 6:29 pm
He was represented by Thurgood Marshall, seven years before Marshall became a justice himself. [read post]
24 Jul 2008, 1:05 am
Will it be pretended that this difference is sufficient to justify an attachment to the State governments, and an abhorrence to the federal government? [read post]
15 May 2008, 3:28 am
However, Chief Justice Marshall famously said in McCulloch v. [read post]
25 Jan 2018, 2:30 am
District of Columbia, a rather arcane case the court decided on Monday. [read post]
17 Aug 2012, 9:56 am
(Later he became a federal district judge.) [read post]
21 Jul 2016, 11:43 am
Vimeo (the 2013 district court ruling) and Columbia v. [read post]
9 Mar 2021, 7:36 am
In Branzburg v. [read post]
31 Dec 2021, 4:12 pm
Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit. [read post]
