Search for: "Marshall v. District of Columbia Government" Results 81 - 100 of 153
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Jul 2010, 7:39 am by admin
Also at NPR, Larry Abramson describes the complaints that, notwithstanding the Court’s decision two years ago in District of Columbia v. [read post]
6 Jul 2007, 11:21 am
October 12 The US Circuit Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia upheld Judge Sirica's ruling that Nixon should surrender tape recordings relevant to Watergate. [read post]
23 Mar 2017, 1:18 pm by Adam Gillette
If one wants to get rid of the individual right to bear arms, one should work to repeal the Second Amendment rather than hoping that the Supreme Court will overturn its decision in District of Columbia v. [read post]
25 Jun 2018, 8:16 am by Aditya Bamzai
Marshall and Northern Pipeline Construction Co. v. [read post]
26 Feb 2018, 2:36 pm by Mark Walsh
“Twenty-three states, the District of Columbia, Puerto Rico, all would have their statutes declared unconstitutional at once. [read post]
5 May 2011, 4:06 pm by Lyle Denniston
Stevens, of course, had dissented in that case, and in the decision  in 2008, in District of Columbia v. [read post]
12 Nov 2019, 11:08 am by Gordon Ahl
The subcommittee will hear testimony from Lech Walesa, the former president of Poland; Melissa Hooper, the director of foreign policy advocacy at Human Rights First; Susan Corke, a senior fellow at the German Marshall Fund; Nate Schenkkan, the director for special research at Freedom House; and Matthias Matthijs, a senior fellow at the Council on Foreign Relations. [read post]
12 Mar 2012, 8:13 am by Ronald Collins
Taft, Liberty Under Law, An Interpretation of the Principles of Our Constitutional Government (1922) Robert Houghwout Jackson, Full Faith and Credit, the Lawyer’s Clause of the Constitution (1945) Hugo L. [read post]
16 Jun 2020, 5:14 am by Richard Altieri, Margaret Taylor
They closed up Wall Street—the financial district of the world, and they had total domination. [read post]
20 Apr 2007, 4:22 am
Thomas also cites a few cases...Chief Justice Marshall, writing for the Court in Cohens v. [read post]
18 Jul 2014, 11:55 am
  But since both of the family cars had identical government-mandated (allegedly) inadequate warnings about not putting an infant car seat next to an airbag, who gets sued, Minigas – even though it’s car had nothing to do with the accident.Farfetched? [read post]
This was a very Blackstonian approach, one recognized by Justice Thurgood Marshall in his concurring opinion in PruneYard Shopping Center v. [read post]
19 Mar 2019, 7:24 am by Katherine Kelley
But there is still no such crime as “sextortion” at the federal level—and the federal government still does not keep data on incidents of sextortion. [read post]
27 Jun 2016, 12:48 pm by Mark Walsh
District Court for the District of Columbia is in the section. [read post]
25 Sep 2020, 2:10 pm by fvanloon
Judge Lamberth called Clinton’s email system “one of the gravest modern offenses to government transparency. [read post]
21 Apr 2011, 8:46 am
In 1981, Judge Vanessa Ruiz of the District of Columbia Court of Appeals successfully argued Havens Realty Corp. v. [read post]