Search for: "Marshall v. District of Columbia Government" Results 121 - 140 of 195
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Jul 2014, 7:35 pm
Plaintiff is a "national cable television network dedicated to reporting on legal and judicial systems of the United States, the 50 states, and the District of Columbia. [read post]
19 Jul 2014, 7:35 pm
Plaintiff is a "national cable television network dedicated to reporting on legal and judicial systems of the United States, the 50 states, and the District of Columbia. [read post]
18 Jul 2014, 11:55 am
  But since both of the family cars had identical government-mandated (allegedly) inadequate warnings about not putting an infant car seat next to an airbag, who gets sued, Minigas – even though it’s car had nothing to do with the accident.Farfetched? [read post]
24 Jun 2014, 1:00 pm by Jeff Hermes
The network expanded dramatically as the CMLP promoted the concept of pro bono media law services, eventually reaching the point where the OMLN's member attorneys included hundreds of law firms, individual attorneys, and legal clinics, with members in all fifty states (plus the District of Columbia) and affiliations with international media law networks. [read post]
24 Jun 2014, 1:00 pm by Jeff Hermes
The network expanded dramatically as the CMLP promoted the concept of pro bono media law services, eventually reaching the point where the OMLN's member attorneys included hundreds of law firms, individual attorneys, and legal clinics, with members in all fifty states (plus the District of Columbia) and affiliations with international media law networks. [read post]
24 Jun 2014, 1:00 pm by Jeff Hermes
The network expanded dramatically as the CMLP promoted the concept of pro bono media law services, eventually reaching the point where the OMLN's member attorneys included hundreds of law firms, individual attorneys, and legal clinics, with members in all fifty states (plus the District of Columbia) and affiliations with international media law networks. [read post]
24 Jun 2014, 12:00 am by Jeff Hermes
The network expanded dramatically as the CMLP promoted the concept of pro bono media law services, eventually reaching the point where the OMLN's member attorneys included hundreds of law firms, individual attorneys, and legal clinics, with members in all fifty states (plus the District of Columbia) and affiliations with international media law networks. [read post]
17 Feb 2014, 12:12 pm
Marshall (2006) case (which I observed as a clerk) and the Stern v. [read post]
11 Dec 2013, 7:28 am
It seems reasonable to read the words "such jurisdiction" in the phrase as referring back to the jurisdiction in which the judge is sitting; i.e., in this case, the District of Columbia, since the provision mentions no other jurisdiction. [read post]
29 Oct 2013, 8:20 pm
The case arose from out of a petition to the Supreme Court by William Marbury, to seek enforcement of his appointment by President John Adams, made at almost the very last possible moment of his waning Presidency, as Justice of the Peace in the District of Columbia. [read post]
23 Oct 2013, 11:48 am by Cynthia L. Hackerott
In that action, three hospitals affiliated with the University of Pittsburgh Medical Center (UPMC) Health Plan, an HMO, have appealed a ruling by the federal district court for the District of Columbia holding that, although the hospitals did not directly contract with the federal government, they were still subject to OFCCP jurisdiction as federal subcontractors (UPMC Braddock v Harris, March 30, 2013, (96 EPD ¶44,801)). [read post]
3 Aug 2013, 7:44 am by Eric Muller
Thereafter, he studied and taught at Columbia University Law School while earning an LL.M. degree. [read post]
10 May 2013, 1:35 pm by Ronald Collins
., and Thurgood Marshall, he wrote, “No one thunders, no one roars. [read post]
7 May 2013, 6:39 pm by Mark Theodore
  When the rule was promulgated (over a din of complaints), it was immediately challenged in South Carolina and in the District of Columbia. [read post]
25 Dec 2012, 9:01 pm by Michael C. Dorf
The high Court’s two leading Second Amendment cases—District of Columbia v. [read post]