Search for: "Marshall v. District of Columbia Government" Results 141 - 153 of 153
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Nov 2015, 9:39 am by Ronald Collins
In elected office, Warren pursued a Progressive vision of clean government, bipartisanship, and professional ethics. [read post]
18 Mar 2010, 2:47 pm by Beck, et al.
City of Marshall, 42 F.3d 925, 931 (5th Cir. 1995) (notwithstanding Conley, “conclusory allegations or legal conclusions masquerading as factual assertions will not suffice to prevent a motion to dismiss”); Cayman Exploration Corp. v. [read post]
29 Mar 2017, 5:09 am by SHG
Essentially, successful entrepreneurs were working for the government. [read post]
11 Dec 2020, 12:51 pm by fvanloon
Embassy in Kyiv mentioning Burisma (Judicial Watch v. [read post]
23 Oct 2020, 2:42 pm by fvanloon
District Court for the District of Columbia (Daily Caller News Foundation v. [read post]
24 Jul 2014, 7:35 pm
Plaintiff is a "national cable television network dedicated to reporting on legal and judicial systems of the United States, the 50 states, and the District of Columbia. [read post]
19 Jul 2014, 7:35 pm
Plaintiff is a "national cable television network dedicated to reporting on legal and judicial systems of the United States, the 50 states, and the District of Columbia. [read post]
12 Jun 2019, 7:26 am by Kate Shaw
Justice Stevens: Of course, some of the memories, the [District of Columbia v.] [read post]
20 Jul 2017, 11:00 am by Jane Chong
No doubt many Americans found his resignation hard to square with our own conception of what it takes to trigger the departure of a head of government, but the difference comes down to a parliamentary government power structure exceedingly unlike our own. [read post]
10 May 2013, 1:35 pm by Ronald Collins
., and Thurgood Marshall, he wrote, “No one thunders, no one roars. [read post]
1 Jul 2010, 5:20 pm by carie
Jeffrey Fisher, who clerked for Stevens in the 1998-99 term and is now a professor at Stanford, says, “The reason he very rarely speaks first is that he really listens to his colleagues and tries to figure out what is on their minds and tries to figure out what the swing votes care about in the case.”On September 9th last year, Stevens engaged in a classic version of advocacy-by-interrogation during the argument of Citizens United v. [read post]
15 Mar 2010, 10:14 am by Hilde
Jeffrey Fisher, who clerked for Stevens in the 1998-99 term and is now a professor at Stanford, says, “The reason he very rarely speaks first is that he really listens to his colleagues and tries to figure out what is on their minds and tries to figure out what the swing votes care about in the case.”On September 9th last year, Stevens engaged in a classic version of advocacy-by-interrogation during the argument of Citizens United v. [read post]