Search for: "Marshall v. Superior Court (People) (1986)"
Results 1 - 14
of 14
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Jun 2008, 7:31 am
Pam KarlanRick Hills's recent post over at Prawfsblawg on the Supreme Court's decision in Riley v. [read post]
4 Aug 2008, 5:43 pm
Georgia (1972) 408 U.S. 238, until rendered moot by the California Supreme Court decision in People v. [read post]
1 Oct 2019, 6:26 am
Crosswhite in Superior Court, Cabarrus County. [read post]
12 Mar 2012, 8:13 am
Byrnes, The Supreme Court [read post]
5 Dec 2007, 4:52 pm
(Superior Court of Santa Clara County, No. [read post]
11 Jul 2008, 6:44 pm
Superior Court Judge Francis R. [read post]
2 May 2023, 9:01 pm
Wade in Dobbs v. [read post]
22 Apr 2024, 5:00 am
Inst. v. [read post]
6 Jul 2012, 8:55 am
Supp. 2d 367, 374 (D.N.J. 2010). 41037-1-II / 41047-8-II FACTS The State charged Roden in two separate cause numbers with attempted possession of heroin (superior court cause no. 09-1-01153-0) and with possession of heroin (superior court cause no. 10-1-00091-4). [read post]
2 Jul 2010, 3:26 pm
In so many past wartime decisions, the Court had deferred to the president’s “superior expertise” in national security (Pearlstein). [read post]
16 Aug 2010, 2:26 pm
Charles, 476 U.S. 54, 69, 106 S.Ct. 1697, 90 L.Ed.2d 48 (1986). [read post]
28 Apr 2009, 12:45 am
The Court had asked for briefing on whether Jackson should be overturned in the context of Montejo v. [read post]
10 Jun 2013, 8:31 am
The overwhelming result of all trials ends in a verdict of guilt for the accused and at that point another state official (bailiff, prison warden, parole officer, etc.) is obligated to apply the decision.[9] However, Dubber clarifies that the reference to the State in the style of cause is not thought to be a requirement for the publicness of a dispute.[10] He cites German cases that refer simply to the ‘Criminal Case against X’; a reference to ‘the… [read post]
10 Jun 2013, 8:31 am
The overwhelming result of all trials ends in a verdict of guilt for the accused and at that point another state official (bailiff, prison warden, parole officer, etc.) is obligated to apply the decision.[9] However, Dubber clarifies that the reference to the State in the style of cause is not thought to be a requirement for the publicness of a dispute.[10] He cites German cases that refer simply to the ‘Criminal Case against X’; a reference to ‘the… [read post]
