Search for: "Marshall v. United States" Results 281 - 300 of 2,510
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 May 2017, 6:30 am by Dan Ernst
Far from denying tribal property rights, Justice Marshall's opinion in this case, as explicated by later cases, actually sought to protect tribal title from expropriation by the United States unless the tribes voluntarily consented to the transfer of land.While it is true that the opinion contains offensive and racist language, assumptions, and arguments, it is important not to ignore the ways in which the opinion sought to criticize, as well as justify, conquest and… [read post]
18 Jan 2018, 3:00 am by Scott Bomboy
The state of Maryland had placed a tax on the Second Bank of the United States branch in that state. [read post]
13 Oct 2014, 6:30 am by Dan Ernst
(LC)In 1936-1937, Justice George Sutherland wrote his only two United States Supreme Court opinions about freedom of expression. [read post]
18 Nov 2014, 1:02 am by rhapsodyinbooks
Massachusetts Attorney General Martha Coakley In 2013, the Supreme Court ruled in United States v. [read post]
19 Sep 2019, 5:49 am by Robert Brammer
Several of his rulings eventually reached the Supreme Court on appeal, such as the Pentagon Papers case, United States v. [read post]
8 Mar 2019, 12:08 pm by raoneeri
Thomas Professor of Law, was featured in an episode of the popular new podcast Ipse Dixit to discuss his book “United States v. [read post]
7 Jun 2007, 12:16 pm
The granted issues in United States v. [read post]
7 Feb 2023, 8:55 pm by Lawrence Solum
In this Article we examine how the Doctrine of Discovery was adapted and applied in Australia and the United States. [read post]
8 Nov 2016, 1:57 pm by Native American Rights Fund
State of Washington (Treaty Right to Take Shellfish) California Valley Miwok Tribe v. [read post]
8 Apr 2007, 3:32 pm
At the conclusion of the hearing the Court took the matter of contempt findings under advisement and directed that the Marshals Service and their contractors conduct a further investigation and then file with the Court a plan of action designed to insure that federal detainees will receive appropriate medical care in the future and, most importantly, will insure that there is good compliance with the Court's medical orders in the future.The United States… [read post]