Search for: "Marshall v. United States" Results 81 - 100 of 1,892
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Jun 2014, 9:19 am by Federalist Society
This case presented two questions regarding the power of bankruptcy courts: One, does Article III of the Constitution permit bankruptcy courts to exercise the judicial power of the United States on the basis of litigant consent--and if so, can consent be implied by litigant conduct? [read post]
19 Jun 2014, 9:19 am by Federalist Society
This case presented two questions regarding the power of bankruptcy courts: One, does Article III of the Constitution permit bankruptcy courts to exercise the judicial power of the United States on the basis of litigant consent--and if so, can consent be implied by litigant conduct? [read post]
26 Aug 2014, 7:50 am
Constitution or Title 28 of the United States Code if it issues proposed findings and rulings on the type of issue identified in Stern v. [read post]
15 Nov 2019, 6:30 am by Sandy Levinson
Schwartz, The Spirit of the Constitution: John Marshall and the 200-Year Odyssey of McCulloch v. [read post]
21 Nov 2006, 11:58 am
  The United States Marshals seized $3,000 from Perez-Colon. [read post]
18 Dec 2011, 9:25 am by Daniel E. Cummins
In the recent United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania decision of Smith v. [read post]
18 Jan 2010, 12:23 pm by E.L. Lipman
Last Tuesday, the Supreme Court of the United States heard oral argument in the case of U.S. v. [read post]
8 Jul 2020, 4:30 am by Josh Blackman
" As Chief Justice Marshall later explained, if any part of an Act is "unconstitutional, the provisions of that part may be disregarded while full effect will be given to such as are not repugnant to the constitution of the United States. [read post]
1 Oct 2020, 2:50 pm by Josh Blackman
"He's the most important Supreme Court justice, certainly of the first 100 years of the United States," Finkelman said. [read post]
16 Jun 2020, 5:14 am by Richard Altieri, Margaret Taylor
On June 1, President Trump spoke to governors and the public about deploying the military within the United States. [read post]
Ultimately, a comprehensive online voting regime in the United States is not off the table in perpetuity. [read post]
25 Jul 2011, 4:23 am by John Day
The extremely well-written opinion marshals the arguments against the application of the federal standard in state court proceedings and will be of benefit to lawyers around the nation who attempt to keep the federal standard out of state courts. [read post]
20 Feb 2016, 4:07 am by Ezra Rosser
Ferguson, Justice John Marshall Harlan argued that in the United States, there was “no caste here. [read post]