Search for: "Marshall v. United States" Results 121 - 140 of 1,905
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Jan 2021, 4:03 pm by Michel-Adrien
 Five people died in the riots.Earlier posts on the topic include:US Glossary on Treason, Sedition, Insurrection (The Marshall Project, January 8, 2021): "In the 24 hours since a mob incited by the president of the United States stormed the Capitol attempting to halt the functioning of American democracy, the news media and everyone else have been at a loss for words to describe what happened. [read post]
17 Jan 2021, 11:28 am by Dale Carpenter
As Chief Justice John Marshall wrote in Marbury v. [read post]
15 Jan 2021, 11:40 am by Andrew J. Grotto
The director will: [S]erve as the principal advisor to the President on cybersecurity policy and strategy relating to the coordination of [cyber defense, cyber-related diplomacy, understanding and deterring malicious cyber actors, and engaging with industry, among others] [§ 1752(A)] [O]ffer advice and consultation to the National Security Council and its staff, the Homeland Security Council and its staff, and relevant Federal departments and agencies, for their consideration relating to the… [read post]
14 Jan 2021, 5:57 pm by Michel-Adrien Sheppard
Questions to Guide an Investigation of the Capitol Attack (Just Security, New York University School of Law, January 11, 2021): “The invasion of the United States Capitol was an entirely predictable event, which makes the wholesale security collapse all the more unconscionable. [read post]
6 Jan 2021, 12:44 am by Léon Dijkman
Ericsson also asked for and obtained an indemnity in case the Wuhan Court fines Ericsson for participating in its US case or asserting its United States patent rights for the amount of the fine. [read post]
30 Dec 2020, 11:32 am by Eugene Volokh
Duck Duck Go, Inc., which operates the fourth-largest search engine in the United States, submitted a comment on October 21, 2020. [read post]
17 Dec 2020, 9:57 am
  In the United States, a focus on extent of the challenge of CVID-19 for China, and the measures taken by Chinese authorities, as well as widely circulated news coverage of speculation about the origins of the disease within the food markets or the infectious laboratories in the first great disease epicenter—Wuhan, China[11]—appeared to give rise to anti-Asian sentiment. [read post]
11 Dec 2020, 9:07 pm
And in turn, that invalidity taints the vote in the Electoral College, by mingling invalid votes with valid ones.As Justice Marshall famously stated in Marbury v. [read post]
11 Dec 2020, 2:00 am
And in turn, that invalidity taints the vote in the Electoral College, by mingling invalid votes with valid ones.As Justice Marshall famously stated in Marbury v. [read post]
8 Dec 2020, 10:55 am by Josh Blackman
The Supreme Court of the United States has descended from the disciplined legal reasoning of John Marshall and Joseph Story to the mystical aphorisms of the fortune cookie. [read post]
23 Nov 2020, 8:45 am by Unknown
," Migration Information Source, 20 Nov. 2020 [text]Related posts:- Regional Focus: US Immigration Policy under a New Administration (11 Nov. 2020)- Regional Focus: United States - Pt. 1 (24 Oct. 2020)- Regional Focus: United States - Pt. 2 (24 Oct. 2020) [read post]
19 Nov 2020, 4:30 pm by INFORRM
  Register for Free Decisions this Week United StatesIndex Newspapers v. [read post]
12 Nov 2020, 2:18 pm by Kevin LaCroix
[vii] Compliance with Regulation D does not assure compliance with applicable state securities laws. [read post]
6 Nov 2020, 1:22 pm by Jayesh Rathod
Enter Agusto Niz-Chavez, a Guatemalan national who fled violence in his home country and arrived in the United States in 2005. [read post]
4 Nov 2020, 6:00 am by Ruth Levush
Most people would agree that the Supreme Court is one of the most important government institutions of the United States, due to its power of judicial review rooted in the famous Marbury v. [read post]
 Hurley, Texas (shorthand for the state challengers), and the Solicitor General (or “SG” for the intervening United States) argue that the insurance requirement cannot be severed and thus the entire ACA must fall. [read post]