Search for: "Martin v. Harris"
Results 1 - 20
of 326
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Mar 2025, 12:30 pm
So, we're happy to say that on April 29th the Supreme Court will hear Martin v. [read post]
26 Feb 2025, 2:33 am
The defendant’s “submissions in support of [its] motion did not establish, prima facie, the absence of at least one element of the legal malpractice cause of action” (McGlynn v Burns & Harris, Esq., 223 AD3d at 734). [read post]
21 Feb 2025, 6:29 am
Musk II for Executive Compensation and for Stockholder Ratification Posted by Gail Weinstein, Philip Richter, and Steven Epstein, Fried, Frank, Harris, Shriver & Jacobson LLP, on Saturday, February 15, 2025 Tags: Delaware Court of Chancery, Elon Musk, Executive Compensation, stockholders The Industry Veteran CEO: Friend or Foe? [read post]
21 Feb 2025, 6:29 am
Musk II for Executive Compensation and for Stockholder Ratification Posted by Gail Weinstein, Philip Richter, and Steven Epstein, Fried, Frank, Harris, Shriver & Jacobson LLP, on Saturday, February 15, 2025 Tags: Delaware Court of Chancery, Elon Musk, Executive Compensation, stockholders The Industry Veteran CEO: Friend or Foe? [read post]
2 Feb 2025, 4:00 am
" United States v. [read post]
28 Jan 2025, 3:26 am
This was developed upon in Kogan v Martin [2017] EWHC 2927 (IPEC), which concerned joint authorship in a film screenplay, which was held to be "more accurately described as a dramatic work, as its primary purpose lies in being performed, as opposed to being read, like a novel. [read post]
30 Dec 2024, 10:15 am
Craig (Kaplan Martin LLP) and Joshua Matz and Kate Harris (Hecker Fink LLP) represent Carroll.The post Second Circuit Panel Upholds E. [read post]
20 Sep 2024, 3:00 am
Since the fall of Roe v. [read post]
13 Aug 2024, 12:35 pm
Martin, 248 N.C. [read post]
7 Aug 2024, 4:26 am
It would undermine the basis of Marbury v. [read post]
9 Jul 2024, 9:01 pm
In Trump v. [read post]
1 Jul 2024, 12:05 am
Research and Resources Husovec, Martin and Grote, Tatjana and Mazhar, Yara and Mikhaeil, Cham and Escalona, Harold Miñarro and Sinha Kumar, Pragya and Sreenath, Sanjana, Grand Confusion After Sanchez v. [read post]
24 Jun 2024, 3:04 pm
MARTIN LACKEY GARCIA IS FACING CHARGES IN CONNECTION WITH THE 2020 STABBINGS THAT HAPPENED AT THE WELLNESS AND RECOVERY CENTER NORTH. [read post]
21 May 2024, 5:55 am
For instance in Tremblay et al. v. [read post]
17 Apr 2024, 8:59 am
King v. [read post]
18 Mar 2024, 3:52 am
An innocent man wrongly named as the assassin who murdered Perth bikie ex-boss Nick Martin has won his defamation case, with the person who posted the false accusation to Facebook ordered to pay him $250,000 in damages. [read post]
9 Feb 2024, 6:30 am
Danilack, Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP, on Sunday, February 4, 2024 Tags: Activism, AI, Artificial intelligence, data analytics, Environment, litigation, Public disclosures, Risk management, SEC, Sustainability, technology Caremark Claim Based on Business Risks Dismissed Posted by Richard Horvath, Stephen Leitzell, and Taylor Jaszewski, Dechert LLP, on Monday, February 5, 2024 Tags: Business risk, Court of Chancery, Delaware Court of Chancery, Delaware law, In re Caremark, Legal compliance,… [read post]
9 Feb 2024, 6:30 am
Danilack, Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP, on Sunday, February 4, 2024 Tags: Activism, AI, Artificial intelligence, data analytics, Environment, litigation, Public disclosures, Risk management, SEC, Sustainability, technology Caremark Claim Based on Business Risks Dismissed Posted by Richard Horvath, Stephen Leitzell, and Taylor Jaszewski, Dechert LLP, on Monday, February 5, 2024 Tags: Business risk, Court of Chancery, Delaware Court of Chancery, Delaware law, In re Caremark, Legal compliance,… [read post]
27 Jan 2024, 7:54 pm
[This post is co-authored with Professor Seth Barrett Tillman] On January 18, Professor Akhil Reed Amar and Professor Vikram Amar filed an amicus brief in Trump v. [read post]
29 Dec 2023, 2:52 pm
May 4, 2010) (concluding that a defendant's characterization of a plaintiff as racist "is a subjective assertion, not sufficiently susceptible to being proved true or false to constitute defamation"); Martin v. [read post]
