Search for: "Martin v. Ohio" Results 301 - 320 of 449
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Apr 2010, 3:44 pm by admin
Wilkinson, Youngstown News, March 31, 2010 A&L Salvage Landfill has agreed to more than a $4 million settlement with the Ohio Environmental Protection Agency to correct long-standing problems at its closed landfill. [read post]
7 Mar 2010, 8:11 pm by cdw
” [via Ninth Circuit  blog] Shaun Martin has more. [read post]
10 Feb 2010, 3:30 am by Russ Bensing
  It may well have happened with last week’s decision in Disciplinary Counsel v. [read post]
26 Jan 2010, 10:54 am by Jeff Gamso
Last week we learned that Judge Berchelmann doesn't think there should be any sanction imposed on Sharon Keller.Yesterday, we saw that the Supreme Court declined its own invitation to overrule (or at least weaken) Melendez-Diaz v. [read post]
10 Jan 2010, 8:16 am
  This approach was held to be valid under the federal Constitution in Martin v. [read post]
5 Oct 2009, 7:24 am
The composition of the majority (Judges Cole and Martin) granting the stay in Reynolds v. [read post]
23 Sep 2009, 3:01 am
  That fits in with Martin’s argument, but also with the court’s treatment of allied offenses in State v. [read post]
22 Sep 2009, 11:00 am
Accordingly, assuming, without deciding, that Senator Skelos presently has standing to sue the Governor, we now proceed to the merits (see Matter of New York State Assn. of Criminal Defense Lawyers v Kaye, 96 NY2d 512, 516 [2001]; Babigian v Wachtler, 69 NY2d 1012, 1013 [1987]; Matter of Roman Catholic Diocese of Albany v New York State Dept. of Health, 66 NY2d 948, 951 [1985]). [read post]
14 Aug 2009, 3:58 am
  The constitutionality of Ohio’s Adam Walsh Act, the latest effort to impose ever more Draconian sanctions on sex offenders, is presently pending before the Supreme Court in State v. [read post]
7 Aug 2009, 3:34 am
   Martin (pictured at left giving the oral argument in State v. [read post]
4 Jun 2009, 6:41 am
Stanford student Martine Cicconi summarizes Monday’s opinion in Bobby v. [read post]