Search for: "Martin v. Ohio Parole Bd"
Results 1 - 1
of 1
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Jan 2008, 11:58 am
The district judge held that the use of videoconferencing at Wilkins's parole revocation hearing did not violate his rights to due process and to confront his accuser and therefore did not violate the Fifth and Sixth Amendments. [read post]
