Search for: "Martin v. Penn Line Serv., Inc." Results 1 - 5 of 5
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Nov 2007, 9:18 pm
We hold that Scheehle's constitutional challenge to the Appointment System is properly considered under the regulatory takings test set forth in Penn Central Transportation Company v. [read post]
7 Nov 2014, 5:52 am
 A warning about an inherent risk – a so-called “risk warning” – serves an entirely different purpose.With inherent risks, people are warned so they can decide whether that risk outweighs the benefits that might be gained from using the product. [read post]
12 Nov 2007, 7:50 am
In fact, 65% of the people UCP affiliates serve have a disability other than cerebral palsy. [read post]