Search for: "Martinez v. New Haven" Results 1 - 20 of 30
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Feb 2008, 3:53 am
I took a look at the Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court opinion in Cote-Whitacre v. [read post]
16 Jul 2012, 12:35 pm by Steve Hall
"   If you haven't read his must-read column, I hope you'll do so now.In March of this year in Martinez v. [read post]
11 Dec 2009, 12:22 pm
The latest - and perhaps last - news about the New Haven firefighters on the winning side in last Term's Ricci v. [read post]
16 Apr 2010, 11:47 am by Kedar
Martinez, the conservative justices might like to see media coverage minimized so Justice Kennedy wouldn’t feel so uncomfortable ruling in their direction. 3) Another strategic move I haven’t discovered (TITCR) 4) Caprice. [read post]
22 Feb 2018, 8:04 am by Evan Lee
Post Molina-Martinez, we haven’t found any examples of courts utilizing that for a guidelines range error. [read post]
23 Feb 2016, 2:17 pm by Dennis Crouch
There are lots of entities creating new products every day, new services, . . . . [read post]
23 May 2012, 4:00 pm by John Elwood
  First up is the much anticipated City of New Haven v. [read post]
13 Jun 2012, 8:18 am by Roy Ginsburg
In this context, haven’t you really already answered your question about the wisest course of action going forward? [read post]
19 Nov 2010, 11:37 am by lawmrh
But just days after the California Supreme Court Upholds In-State Tuition For Illegal Immigrants, in Robert Martinez et al., v. [read post]
27 Feb 2014, 1:42 pm by John Elwood
  Fans of IFP petitions, do not despair: Martinez v. [read post]
3 May 2012, 5:19 pm by INFORRM
. “Centre of interests” Jaron Lewis, a partner at RPC, where he leads the firm’s media group, updated delegates on online defamation & privacy and began with the Joined Cases C-509/09 and C-161/10 eDate Advertising GmbH v X and Olivier Martinez v MGN Ltd in relation to jurisdiction. [read post]
10 Sep 2010, 8:07 am by Bexis
  Alternative design is a “factor” in the risk/utility test, id. at 305, but we haven’t seen a case where the California Supreme Court has declared it an essential element.California allows comparison of a plaintiff's negligence and a defendant's strict liability. [read post]