Search for: "Martinez v. People" Results 61 - 80 of 356
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Jan 2009, 12:54 am
We note that, because the sentence is illegal, we reach this issue despite defendant's failure to raise it either at the time of sentencing or on appeal (see People v Adams, 45 AD3d 1346; People v Martinez, 213 AD2d 1072). [read post]
9 Oct 2014, 6:38 pm by Donald Thompson
 This duty of fair dealing encompasses an obligation to ensure fairness in grand jury submissions (People v Pelchat, supra; People v Jordan, 153 AD2d 263 [2nd Dept 1990]; People v Russo, 128 Misc2d 876, 880 [Co Ct Suffolk Co 1985]), which includes notice of the grand jury proceedings that gives a defendant a reasonable opportunity to exercise his right to testify, not mere technical compliance with minimum statutory notice requirements… [read post]
28 Jun 2010, 10:18 pm by Transplanted Lawyer
Today's big Supreme Court decision, Christian Legal Society Chapter of the University of California, Hastings College of the Law, AKA Hastings Christian Fellowship v. [read post]
22 Jul 2020, 4:49 pm by Unknown
Haynes Investments, LLC (Payday Lending)Martinez v. [read post]
29 Oct 2010, 9:18 am by Steven G. Pearl
People seem to forget that the Court has no deadline for hearing cases on its docket, as demonstrated by the fact that it took more than five years to decide Martinez v. [read post]
4 Oct 2011, 11:28 am
Saying to someone:  "You're disabled, so we don't want you" is hardly something designed to make people pleased with your performance.Judge Bea's best argument is his speculation that defense counsel might not have objected to the prosecution's dismissal of juror Martinez for strategic reasons that don't appear on the record.  [read post]