Search for: "Martinez v. State of Texas"
Results 161 - 180
of 268
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Mar 2012, 4:27 am
” There's a chance this may change with the Supreme Court's consideration of an Arizona case, Martinez v. [read post]
29 Sep 2017, 11:37 am
Second, while the formal parties in a criminal proceeding are the defendant and the State of Texas, In re Amos, 397 S.W.3d 309, 314 (Tex. [read post]
2 Mar 2012, 7:58 am
North Carolina, 11-6624, appears to be a straightforward hold for Martinez v. [read post]
13 May 2012, 8:33 am
Mar. 29, 2012); Martinez v. [read post]
18 Feb 2015, 1:30 pm
§ 3599(f) to investigate and develop a claim of ineffective assistance of trial counsel if the claim has been procedurally defaulted, regardless of whether the petitioner can establish cause for the default under Martinez v. [read post]
1 Jun 2016, 2:07 pm
Texas 15-797Issue: (1) Whether it violates the Eighth Amendment and this Court’s decisions in Hall v. [read post]
23 Apr 2009, 8:00 am
Texas Prison Bidness lets us know about a bill by Rep. [read post]
10 Jul 2016, 9:30 pm
In its last term, the Supreme Court took up the case of Molina-Martinez v. [read post]
6 Jun 2011, 4:00 am
Law, Baehr v. [read post]
19 Mar 2015, 8:05 am
Cox 14-531Issue: Whether this Court’s decision in Martinez v. [read post]
8 May 2020, 11:53 am
Neither a hearing or court order is necessary for discovery to be mandated In 2008, two of our senior attorneys, Letty Martinez and Christy Jack, went to trial on one of the most serious charges in the state of Texas. [read post]
30 Jan 2012, 1:03 pm
Arizona, 10-9742, for Martinez v. [read post]
23 May 2012, 4:00 pm
A subsequent state habeas petition from Cook, 10-9742, was then put on hold for Martinez v. [read post]
25 May 2008, 8:18 pm
Texas 5-1-2000 Question:Does an amended Texas statute that authorizes the conviction of sexual offenses on the victim's testimony alone, whereas the statute previously required the victim's testimony along with corroborating evidence, violate the constitutional prohibition against State "ex post facto" laws when applied in a trial for offenses committed before the amendment's effective date? [read post]
16 Aug 2022, 6:24 am
The problem is illustrated Martinez v. [read post]
29 Apr 2011, 7:43 am
Martinez-Cid, Podhurst Orseck, Miami None 11 $152,000,000 Products Liability Estate of Evans v. [read post]
2 Jul 2010, 8:24 am
The State of Texas v. [read post]
12 May 2022, 10:03 am
Arteaga-Martinez and Garland v. [read post]
5 Sep 2008, 3:32 pm
U.S. v. [read post]
27 May 2016, 8:00 am
Texas, 15-797, a state-on-bottom capital case with roots in Houston. [read post]
