Search for: "Marts v. Superior Court" Results 1 - 20 of 357
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Jul 2011, 12:30 pm by webmaster
Pennsylvania’s Superior Court has affirmed the jury verdict against Wal-Mart in a rare class action trial. [read post]
29 Jul 2011, 12:30 pm by webmaster
Pennsylvania’s Superior Court has affirmed the jury verdict against Wal-Mart in a rare class action trial. [read post]
14 Jun 2011, 5:57 am
Of course, Wal-Mart has that other class action pending... the Supreme Court opinion in Wal-Mart v. [read post]
30 Jan 2018, 9:16 am by Andrew Schafer
Wal-Mart, the Ontario Superior Court of Justice awarded an eye-popping $1.67 million to a former executive in a wrongful dismissal action. [read post]
8 Nov 2010, 7:00 pm by Chris Semerjian
The arbitrator’s decision against Wal-Mart was upheld by Quebec’s Superior Court. [read post]
16 Sep 2010, 1:28 pm by Daniel E. Cummins
(Gantman, J., dissenting).In its non-precedential opinion, the Superior Court quoted extensively from the case Mull v. [read post]
27 Jan 2014, 9:38 am by H. Scott Leviant
Superior Court (2004) 34 Cal.4th 319, 326, 17 Cal.Rptr.3d 906, 96 P.3d 194; Ghazaryan v. [read post]
20 Jun 2011, 8:41 am by Steven G. Pearl
As anticipated, the Supreme Court of the United States this morning reversed the district court's order in Dukes v. [read post]
15 Jun 2011, 9:26 pm by Will Aitchison
Wal-Mart challenged the judgment by appealing to the Superior Court. [read post]
26 Mar 2024, 5:00 am
(Op. by Dubow, J.), the Pennsylvania Superior Court reversed a trial court Order transferring the venue of the action. [read post]
4 Jun 2007, 6:00 am
Finally, as to the manageability prong, the Court noted that courts in other states (notably, California and my firm's own Wal-Mart case, Savaglio v. [read post]
9 Apr 2014, 8:00 am by Steven G. Pearl
 The trial court originally certified an “off-the-clock” class, but granted Allstate’s motion for decertification after the United States Supreme Court’s decision in Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. [read post]