Search for: "Massachusetts Trustees v. United States" Results 21 - 40 of 82
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 May 2014, 11:03 am by Brian E. Barreira
In the case of Walker, the offending language was: “The Trustee is prohibited from spending sums of interest or principal to [Walker] for her benefit for services which are otherwise available under any public entitlement program of the United States of America, the Commonwealth of Massachusetts, or any political subdivision thereof. [read post]
18 May 2014, 11:03 am by Brian E. Barreira
In the case of Walker, the offending language was: “The Trustee is prohibited from spending sums of interest or principal to [Walker] for her benefit for services which are otherwise available under any public entitlement program of the United States of America, the Commonwealth of Massachusetts, or any political subdivision thereof. [read post]
11 Apr 2014, 7:38 am
  A “home” can be a single family dwelling, a 2-4 family home, a manufactured home, a condo unit,  or a residential coop unit. [read post]
8 Dec 2011, 10:48 am
Saxon Mortgage, Inc., and answered a certified question from the United States Bankruptcy Court.   [read post]
21 May 2014, 4:46 am
In 2009, Scott filed a voluntary petition for bankruptcy and in January of 2010 he met with the “Trustee for the United States, the Trustee's counsel, and the Trustee's accounting firm, Verdolino & Lowey (V & L). [read post]
24 May 2017, 11:52 am by admin
You can read the full opinion in Midland Funding LLC v. [read post]
26 Aug 2014, 7:50 am
Constitution or Title 28 of the United States Code if it issues proposed findings and rulings on the type of issue identified in Stern v. [read post]
20 Jan 2011, 9:00 am by Craig Robins
Trustee raised this issue in was the  In re: Galley Case out of Massachusetts, going back to 2008 (United States Trustee v. [read post]
2 Mar 2016, 5:00 pm by Cynthia Marcotte Stamer
Employer and union sponsored group health plans covered by the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (ERISA) and their insurers are not required to comply with a Vermont state law that requires health insurers and certain other parties to report payments relating to health care claims and other information relating to health care services to a state agency for compilation in an all-inclusive health care database, according to the United States Supreme… [read post]
6 Nov 2006, 8:38 am
MIPTC went the United States Supreme Court today and had the opportunity to hear oral arguments in a bankruptcy matter, Robert Louis Marrama v. [read post]
15 Jan 2014, 9:28 am by Ronald Mann
  When Hellman emphasized that this was “his last $75,000,” Justice Alito asked if Hellman knew the median net worth of a household in the United States. [read post]
20 Sep 2007, 12:49 am
So I am left to assume that the Massachusetts state sanitary code is an exception to the limited liability of an entity. [read post]
19 Dec 2017, 9:30 pm by Nicholas Bellos
Six states have added such provisions, all since 1970: Illinois, Pennsylvania, Montana, Massachusetts, Hawaii, and Rhode Island. [read post]