Search for: "Massachusetts v. EPA"
Results 81 - 100
of 727
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Apr 2007, 8:04 am
As Roger Pielke Jr. points out at Prometheus, there is a scientific error in Justice Stevens' Massachusetts v. [read post]
3 Apr 2007, 2:15 pm
Jack Balkin has this post on standing and executive power issues in Massachusetts v. [read post]
5 Apr 2007, 11:19 am
A finding that Massachusetts had standing to complain about EPA's failure to regulate greenhouse gases was essential to the Supreme Court's decision this week in Massachusetts v. [read post]
3 Apr 2007, 3:51 am
In Massachusetts v. [read post]
2 May 2007, 7:01 am
In the recent landmark US Supreme Court case, Massachusetts v. [read post]
17 Apr 2008, 7:00 pm
Eric, perhaps your reference to the EPA is a veiled reference to Massachusetts v. [read post]
23 Jun 2014, 12:33 pm
The roots of this decision date back to 2007, when the Supreme Court ruled in a case now referred to as Massachusetts v. [read post]
10 Apr 2007, 1:04 pm
In the Sunday New York Times, Linda Greenhouse had a very interesting article on Chief Justice Roberts' dissent in Massachusetts v. [read post]
3 Apr 2007, 5:04 am
Massachusetts v. [read post]
27 Dec 2006, 6:12 am
EPA and Environmental Defense v.... [read post]
24 May 2007, 5:35 am
In time, however, Massachusetts v. [read post]
11 Jan 2010, 1:02 pm
Supreme Court in (Massachusetts, et al. v. [read post]
30 Nov 2006, 11:03 am
Massachusetts v. [read post]
15 Jul 2013, 1:50 pm
At least one State, Massachusetts, is currently regulating biogenic carbon dioxide sources at Step Two of the Tailoring Rule. [read post]
25 Jan 2018, 8:16 pm
., v. [read post]
9 Aug 2019, 11:57 am
On August 8, 2019, New York, California, Hawaii, Maryland, Vermont, Washington, Massachusetts, and the District of Columbia (States) also filed a new petition for judicial review concerning the refusal of EPA to ban chlorpyrifos. [read post]
6 Mar 2012, 12:38 pm
The challenges to EPA’s regulations, therefore, present a threshold question: Are EPA’s regulations compelled or permitted by Massachusetts v. [read post]
3 Apr 2007, 4:02 pm
The Supreme Court's 5-4 decision in Massachusetts v. [read post]
3 Apr 2007, 1:08 pm
[JURIST] President Bush urged Congress on Tuesday to adopt his proposed targets for alternative fuel use [White House energy policy materials] as a way of combating greenhouse gas emissions [JURIST news archive; EPA backgrounder] a day after the US Supreme Court ruled in Massachusetts v. [read post]
7 May 2008, 3:44 am
He served in that position for almost a year and helped form the EPA's response to the Supreme Court opinion on Massachusetts v. [read post]
