Search for: "Massachusetts v. United States" Results 1 - 20 of 3,355
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
  Xenotransplantation and Patent Law Biological patents are generally utility patents, which allow the patent holder to exclude others from making, selling, using, or importing their biological invention for a specified period of time, currently twenty years in the United States. [read post]
United States that the statute applied to any act “designed to defraud by representations as to the past or present, or suggestions and promises as to the future. [read post]
27 Mar 2024, 3:39 pm by Guest Author
Origin and Meaning of the Anti-Power-Concentration Principle In Seila Law v. [read post]
18 Mar 2024, 1:41 pm by David Kopel
Babak Sarani, et al., Wounding Patterns Based on Firearm Type in Civilian Public Mass Shootings in the United States, 228 J. [read post]
18 Mar 2024, 7:44 am by Adam Ziegler
We’d all been working for over a year on a contract that would make it possible, someday in the future, for everyone to have free and open access to all the official court decisions ever published in the United States. [read post]
13 Mar 2024, 6:13 am by Samuel Bray
One is the expansion of state standing after Massachusetts v. [read post]
10 Mar 2024, 7:42 am by Dave Maass
At every level of government in the United States (and often in other countries), there are laws that empower the public to file requests for public records. [read post]
7 Mar 2024, 6:08 am by Samuel Bray
And there are other pressures toward abstraction that apply in other cases, such as state standing after Massachusetts v. [read post]
5 Mar 2024, 8:13 am by Marty Lederman
  Thankfully, no Justice wrote to give any credence at all to the absurd arguments that the President isn’t an “officer of the United States” or that the presidency isn’t an office “under the United States. [read post]
23 Feb 2024, 1:50 pm by David Super
  In Massachusetts, ALEC and campaign finance reform groups cooperated to report each other’s Article V applications out of committee. [read post]
21 Feb 2024, 9:00 am by Ortiz Law Firm
The United States District Court for the District of Massachusetts noted that under ERISA’s full and fair review requirement, an insurer is not obligated to disclose IME reports before making their decisions unless the insurer relies on the unshared IME report to find a new reason to deny coverage. [read post]