Search for: "Massachusetts v. United States" Results 41 - 60 of 3,355
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
31 Jan 2022, 11:52 am by Michael DelSignore
  Continue Reading › The post United States Supreme Court Blocks Vaccine Test Rule enacted by the Biden Administration appeared first on Massachusetts Criminal Defense Lawyer Blog. [read post]
8 Jun 2023, 6:00 am by Edward Roggenkamp
On May 25, 2023, the federal District Court for the District of Massachusetts denied a motion by plaintiffs seeking to halt construction of the Vineyard Wind project offshore of Massachusetts, in the case of Seafreeze Shoreside, Inc. v. [read post]
16 Mar 2013, 3:33 pm
The defendant moved to dismiss the charges on the basis that the statute was unconstitutional as a result of the United States Supreme Court's decisions in District of Columbia v. [read post]
10 Mar 2022, 7:37 pm by Michael DelSignore
United States Supreme Court May Decide. appeared first on Massachusetts Criminal Defense Lawyer Blog. [read post]
11 Mar 2013, 6:25 am by Hunton & Williams LLP
” The action will return to the United States District Court for further proceedings. [read post]
12 Jul 2019, 2:23 am by Michael DelSignore
Continue reading The post United States Supreme Court to decide what nexus must be established for a search of a house for drug activity under the Fourth Amendment appeared first on Massachusetts Criminal Defense Lawyer Blog. [read post]
31 Aug 2020, 5:22 am by Michael DelSignore
” Continue reading The post 1st Amendment case involving free speech and social media before the United States Supreme Court appeared first on Massachusetts Criminal Defense Lawyer Blog. [read post]
11 Mar 2013, 6:25 am by Hunton & Williams LLP
” The action will return to the United States District Court for further proceedings. [read post]
31 Aug 2011, 7:52 am by scanner1
RIVERSIDE CONTRACTING, INC., a Montana corporation; UNITED RENTAL HIGHWAY TECHNOLOGIES, INC., n/k/a HIGHWAY TECHNOLOGIES, INC., a Massachusetts corporation; THE STATE OF MONTANA, MONTANA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION; and CARTER & BURGESS, INC., a Texas corporation, Defendants and Appellees. [read post]
26 Jun 2014, 2:35 pm by Ruthann Robson
Professor Ruthann Robson, City University of New York (CUNY) School of Law A unanimous Court, albeit in separate opinions, found the Massachusetts statute imposing a 35 foot buffer zone around places where abortions are performed violates the First Amendment in... [read post]