Search for: "Massachusetts v. United States" Results 81 - 100 of 3,355
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Jul 2013, 7:21 pm
In a recent case involving a constitutional challenge to seizing a person's DNA without his consent, the United States Supreme Judicial Court, in Maryland v. [read post]
9 Oct 2021, 2:06 am by Michael DelSignore
Additionally, the Sixth Amendment of the United States Constitution and Article Twelve of the Massachusetts Declaration of Rights guarantees a defendant’s right to confront a witness at trial. [read post]
8 Jan 2018, 2:26 am by Michael DelSignore
Continue reading The post United States Supreme Court to hear issue on the scope of the 5th Amendment Self Incrimination Clause and how it applies to preliminary hearings appeared first on Massachusetts Criminal Defense Lawyer Blog. [read post]
15 Jan 2014, 12:46 pm by Ruthann Robson
Professor Ruthann Robson, City University of New York (CUNY) School of Law The United States Supreme Court heard oral arguments today in McCullen v. [read post]
29 Dec 2021, 2:22 am by Michael DelSignore
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court to Hear Police Surveillance Case  Under the Fourth Amendment and the United States Supreme Court precedent, there is a reasonable expectation of privacy from government intrusion that all Americans enjoy. [read post]
4 Feb 2015, 11:05 am by Robert Brammer
Massachusetts, 197 U.S. 11 (1905); Zucht v. [read post]
31 Oct 2012, 5:14 am by Howard Friedman
The trial court rejected a challenge under the Massachusetts state constitution to the practice, holding that insertion of the phrase "under God" was a reference to the historical and religious traditions of the United States and did not turn the Pledge into a religious exercise nor violate anti-discrimination requirements. [read post]
9 Nov 2008, 2:01 pm
The United States Supreme Court will hear oral arguments in Argument Preview: Melendez-Diaz v. [read post]
18 May 2010, 10:51 pm by Michael DelSignore
Under the United States Supreme Court interpretation of the Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution, the defendant was clearly not seized as the United States Supreme Court held in a case called California v. [read post]