Search for: "Masson v. New Yorker Magazine, Inc." Results 1 - 17 of 17
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Oct 2011, 2:00 pm by admin
Uchitel’s words, it can rely on the 1991 Supreme Court case Masson v. [read post]
5 Feb 2011, 11:06 am by PaulKostro
New Yorker Magazine, Inc., 501 U.S. 496, 516, 111 S. [read post]
10 Feb 2010, 11:31 pm
”The Constitution, said the court, which protects "vehement, caustic and sometimes unpleasantly sharp attacks" in a political context, does not insist on complete verbal precision.Justice Smith then explained:"In this, the Constitution follows the common law of libel which, as the United States Supreme Court has observed, ‘overlooks minor inaccuracies and concentrates upon substantial truth’ (Masson v New Yorker Magazine,… [read post]
1 Apr 2009, 4:15 am
"The Constitution, said the court, which protects "vehement, caustic and sometimes unpleasantly sharp attacks" in a political context, does not insist on complete verbal precision.Justice Smith then explained:"In this, the Constitution follows the common law of libel which, as the United States Supreme Court has observed, ‘overlooks minor inaccuracies and concentrates upon substantial truth' (Masson v… [read post]
2 Feb 2011, 2:00 am by John Day
New Yorker Magazine, Inc., [501 U.S. 496, 510 (1991)]; McCluen v. [read post]
30 Nov 2011, 8:22 am by Kedar
New Yorker Magazine (1991) 19. [read post]
16 Aug 2017, 11:38 am by Eugene Volokh
New Yorker Magazine, Inc. (1991) (holding that there is a fact question as to actual malice where a news source alters a quote in a manner that changes its meaning). [read post]
6 Nov 2013, 4:52 am
  You can read a little more about the background of the suit in the news story you can find here. [read post]
30 Mar 2023, 5:01 am by Eugene Volokh
New Yorker Magazine, In general, quotation marks around a passage indicate to the reader that the passage reproduces the speaker's words verbatim. [read post]