Search for: "Masterson v. United States" Results 1 - 20 of 24
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Dec 2021, 9:01 pm by Marci A. Hamilton and Leslie C. Griffin
Even though the state’s grand juries discovered that thousands of victims had been abused by hundreds of priests, the legislature has refused to open state courts for the victims. [read post]
15 Aug 2020, 9:15 am by Rebecca Tapscott
On August 3, the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, in Masterson v. [read post]
23 May 2020, 3:35 pm
" (The Court also said the same thing in its earlier opinion in the 2013 case of Masterson v. [read post]
23 May 2020, 3:35 pm
" (The Court also said the same thing in its earlier opinion in the 2013 case of Masterson v. [read post]
8 Apr 2018, 8:26 pm
Mark Lawrence and his Diocese of South Carolina before the United States Supreme Court. [read post]
8 Apr 2018, 2:09 pm
Mark Lawrence and his Diocese of South Carolina before the United States Supreme Court. [read post]
24 Sep 2015, 11:41 am
I will note that our sister state of Georgia, in a 2011 opinion, noted that the South Carolina decision in All Saints has not been followed in a church property case by any court outside that case -- outside that State -- so we're dealing with a bit of an outlier, if you will -- but tell me about Masterson.9 [12:58]: What about all the quit-claims that were issued here? [read post]
19 Sep 2013, 4:10 pm
ECUSA's strategy is geared toward getting an appropriate case into the United States Supreme Court, in its own good time. [read post]
30 Aug 2013, 1:03 pm by Don Cruse
THE EPISCOPAL CHURCH, ET AL., No. 11-0265 Opinion of the Court Dissenting Applying its decision today in ROBERT MASTERSON, MARK BROWN, GEORGE BUTLER... v. [read post]
12 Jul 2010, 9:00 pm
United States v. $30,670, 401 F.3d 448, 457 (7th Cir. 2005). [read post]
6 May 2010, 9:43 am
Among the first courts to address Levine in the context of a generic manufacturer was the United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois in Stacel v. [read post]