Search for: "Matal v. Tam" Results 221 - 240 of 290
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Jul 2017, 1:08 am by Jani Ihalainen
The US Supreme Court endeavoured to answer this question once and for all this summer.The case of Joseph Matal v Simon Shiao Tam dealt with a rock band, The Slants, who sought to register their name as a trademark in the US. [read post]
14 Jul 2017, 8:53 am by Lindsay Griffiths
We have quite an impressive roundup this week from around the world: Alitalia (update 5): the Procedure Letters for the subjects admitted to the data room have been sent from EXPLegal (Italy) Arbitration Amendment Ordinance 2017 gazetted from Sit, Fung, Kwong & Shum (Hong Kong) Mangler ved fast eiendom – nar gammelt byttes med nytt from Okland & Co (Norway) ILN IP Insider: Matal v. [read post]
13 Jul 2017, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar
In what some commentators believe is one of the most important cases of the Supreme Court’s recently concluded term, Matal v. [read post]
30 Jun 2017, 1:55 pm by TWiT
Join Simon Tam of The Slants, Mike Keyes, Denise Howell, and Matt Curtis for a special episode discussing SCOTUS's Matal v. [read post]
30 Jun 2017, 10:08 am by Tom Smith
 After a unanimous Supreme Court decision last week in Matal v Tam rebuked the Patent and Trademark Office for violating the First Amendment in refusing to process trademarks it found offensive, the Department of Justice has surrendered to the Redskins: via hotair.com So much for the "Washington Persons of Interest. [read post]
30 Jun 2017, 6:28 am by Wes Anderson
I hesitate to add to the fallout from Matal v. [read post]
29 Jun 2017, 5:29 am by Lyle Denniston
The new letter said: “The Supreme Court’s decision in Matal v. [read post]
28 Jun 2017, 7:32 am by Kevin Goldberg
”  I can assure you, however, that I would have foreseen the June 19, 2017 decision in favor of The Slants in Matal v. [read post]
28 Jun 2017, 3:59 am by Edith Roberts
” Counting to 5 (podcast) features a discussion of the court’s decision in Matal v. [read post]
27 Jun 2017, 3:10 am
The USPTO has issued Examination Guide No. 1-17 (pdf here), entitled "Examination Guidance for Section 2(a)’s Disparagement Provision after Matal v. [read post]
26 Jun 2017, 9:07 am by Paul Horwitz
Last week, I thought the most important sentence in the Slants case, Matal v. [read post]