Search for: "Matal v. Tam" Results 61 - 80 of 224
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
31 Jul 2017, 4:30 am by Edith Roberts
Briefly: At the Human Rights at Home Blog, Jeremiah Ho weighs in on Matal v. [read post]
9 Sep 2018, 9:09 am by Dennis Crouch
On this second point, the petition explains: Although this court recently concluded in Matal v. [read post]
27 Sep 2018, 9:26 am by Eugene Volokh
So the Ninth Circuit held, applying the reasoning from the Slants case (Matal v. [read post]
27 Jun 2017, 3:10 am
The USPTO has issued Examination Guide No. 1-17 (pdf here), entitled "Examination Guidance for Section 2(a)’s Disparagement Provision after Matal v. [read post]
15 Dec 2017, 8:42 am by Dennis Crouch
This decision follows the Supreme Court’s recent decision in Matal v. [read post]
26 Jun 2019, 8:02 am by Jason Rantanen
” In 2017, the court struck down a provision that denied trademark registration to marks that are “disparaging” in Matal v. [read post]
28 Sep 2018, 2:15 am by Brian Iverson
While Tam settled some issues related to The Slants, the Washington Redskins, and D*kes on Bikes, the decision’s full impact remains to be seen. [read post]
28 Dec 2017, 6:15 am by Gene Quinn
Ben Natter, Jess Sblendorio and Alexander Callo focus on the Supreme Court's decision in Matal v. [read post]