Search for: "Matal v. Tam" Results 81 - 100 of 226
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Jan 2019, 8:04 pm by Dennis Crouch
  In its decision, the court followed the Supreme Court’s lead in Matal v. [read post]
5 Jan 2019, 7:10 am by Sergio Muñoz Sarmiento
If we’re correct, seems likely SCOTUS will follow their Matal v. [read post]
25 Oct 2018, 2:38 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
  Historical perspectives & reflections on Matal v. [read post]
28 Sep 2018, 2:15 am by Brian Iverson
While Tam settled some issues related to The Slants, the Washington Redskins, and D*kes on Bikes, the decision’s full impact remains to be seen. [read post]
27 Sep 2018, 9:26 am by Eugene Volokh
So the Ninth Circuit held, applying the reasoning from the Slants case (Matal v. [read post]
18 Sep 2018, 6:12 am by Craig Foster
  In its appeal, the government cites to another Supreme Court decision regarding the band name “The Slants,” (Matal v. [read post]
18 Sep 2018, 6:12 am by Craig Foster
  In its appeal, the government cites to another Supreme Court decision regarding the band name “The Slants,” (Matal v. [read post]
9 Sep 2018, 9:09 am by Dennis Crouch
On this second point, the petition explains: Although this court recently concluded in Matal v. [read post]
24 Aug 2018, 9:23 am by Ron Coleman
In ex parte appeal to TTAB, applicant argues that Section 2(c) of the Lanham Act violates the First Amendment under Matal v. [read post]
11 Aug 2018, 5:05 am by Brian Iverson
Supreme Court struck down the Lanham Act’s disparagement clause as unconstitutional in Matal v. [read post]
11 Jul 2018, 11:58 am by Eugene Volokh
The government frequently invokes this doctrine at the margins to defend speech regulation — for instance, in Matal v. [read post]