Search for: "Mathews v. United States" Results 61 - 80 of 193
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Feb 2017, 9:15 am by Peter Margulies
Under the test for procedural due process articulated by the Supreme Court in Mathews v. [read post]
7 Feb 2017, 3:27 pm by Jamie Baker
Its more than 2,700 members practice throughout the United States, Canada and other foreign countries. [read post]
3 Jan 2017, 7:31 am by Steve Vladeck
Every jurisdiction in the United States requires at least some criminal defendants to make certain payments to the government tied to their convictions. [read post]
5 Aug 2016, 8:00 am by Dan Ernst
FailingerDenying the Poor Access to Court: United States v. [read post]
11 Jul 2016, 6:20 am
In a handwritten note, Mathew expressed his love for his family and stated, `I have killed myself. [read post]
9 Sep 2015, 2:41 am by ligitsec
In a significant defeat for the administration, United States District Court Judge Rosemary M. [read post]
14 Oct 2014, 5:24 pm by Stephen Bilkis
However, if the Kalin decision allows a lower court to use its discretion to accept a police officer's assertions of their training and experience and the other allegations contained in the complaint, without a description of the substance seized, and declare them to be legally sufficient in all cases, then Kalin, as well as Jahron S., is inconsistent with the court's obligation to protect the constitutional right to procedural due process discussed by the United States… [read post]
7 Oct 2014, 5:19 pm by Stephen Bilkis
" In Hamdi v Rumsfeld, the United States Supreme Court acknowledged that there is a tension "between the autonomy that the Government asserts is necessary in order to pursue effectively a particular goal and the process that a citizen contends he is due before he is deprived of a constitutional right as held in Mathews v Eldridge. [read post]
29 Aug 2014, 12:27 pm by Stephen Bilkis
The second Mathews factor requires the Criminal Court to examine the risk of erroneous deprivation of the interest at stake as a result of the State's procedures and the probable value, if any, of additional or substitute safeguards with respect to that interest. [read post]
25 Aug 2014, 12:24 pm by Stephen Bilkis
In 1979, the United States Supreme Court in Addington v Texas held that constitutional due process required the government to prove two statutory preconditions by clear and convincing evidence before a court could commit an individual to a mental institution: (1) that the person sought to be committed is mentally ill; and (2) that such person requires hospitalization for his own welfare and protection of others. [read post]
27 Jun 2014, 2:00 pm by Matt Danzer
To evaluate this, the court runs through the familiar balancing-of-interests test articulated in the landmark case Mathews v. [read post]