Search for: "Mathews v. United States" Results 81 - 100 of 137
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Apr 2011, 8:03 am by stevemehta
Civil Action No. 09-1931 (RMU), No. 12., 13 United States District Court, District of Columbia. [read post]
7 Feb 2020, 6:22 am by Robert Chesney
Contemporary observers saw the value of the quarantine authority in cases of novel disease outbreaks that originate overseas but eventually find their way to the United States in contexts unrelated to war. [read post]
17 Sep 2021, 5:01 am by Jacob Pagano
Section 1226(a) provides that “an alien may be arrested and detained pending a decision on whether the alien is to be removed from the United States. [read post]
4 Mar 2016, 9:15 am by Jennifer Jordan, JD, MSCC
SYLVIA MATHEWS BURWELL, SECRETARY, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES, Defendant. [read post]
26 Jun 2014, 4:00 am by SHG
Applying Mathews v Eldrige’s deprivation of rights analysis, Judge Brown considered the likelihood of erroneous deprivation. [read post]
28 Apr 2013, 10:39 pm by Shouvik Kumar Guha
The Organization for an International Geographical Indications Network (oriGIn), a producers’ group lobbying in favour of GI, has issued a preliminary list of candidate GIs in the United States, just ahead of a the WIPO Working Group on the Development of the Lisbon System meeting. [read post]
2 Jul 2020, 9:31 am by Amanda L. Tyler
§1252(e)(2) and afforded additional procedural opportunities to seek asylum in the United States. [read post]
6 Apr 2012, 1:41 pm by S2KM Limited
In an article published in the Touro Law Review (Vol 16 page 871), titled "Procedural Due Process Claims", constitutional legal expert Erwin Chemerinsky highlights the following three-part balancing test the United States Supreme Court articulated in Mathews v. [read post]
1 Mar 2011, 2:13 pm by Eugene Volokh
One such legislator was United States Representative Carolyn McCarthy. [read post]
8 Jun 2020, 10:13 am by Schachtman
In any event, under the federal RICO statute (as opposed to the analogous state RICO statutes) showing perjury in a state court proceeding will not be enough to state a valid claim. [read post]