Search for: "Mathis, Appeal of" Results 1 - 20 of 178
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Jan 2024, 1:43 am by Kluwer Patent blogger
’ In reaction, Mathys & Squire concludes: ‘The Court of Appeal’s order sets an important precedent. [read post]
7 Feb 2018, 1:08 pm
  Particularly when you discover that Mathis loses in the Court of Appeal, and the case is remanded back for trial.Still, even good lawyers lose sometimes. [read post]
26 Dec 2014, 12:21 pm
Mathis, supra.The Court of Appeals did not buy Mathis’ Confrontation Clause argument. [read post]
24 Feb 2012, 3:24 pm
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit says that the Securities and Exchange Commission did not abuse its discretion when it determined that broker Scott Mathis “willfully” withheld information from the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority about tax liens. [read post]
23 Mar 2018, 6:35 am by Bryan P. Sears
A conservative radio show host who hoped to run for the Maryland Senate said he will not appeal a judge's ruling that declared him ineligible for the June Republican primary. [read post]
13 Jan 2021, 7:14 am
On December 31, 2020, the Oregon Supreme Court reversed the Oregon Court of Appeals’ decision in Mathis v. [read post]
21 Jun 2011, 8:59 am by CJLF Staff
In 2005, Mathis was within days of being executed before the punishment was stopped so that his claims could be reviewed by the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals. [read post]
19 Sep 2020, 8:27 pm by Patent Docs
Anna Gregson and Stpehne Garner of Mathys & Squire LLP will review how the EPO case law has developed since the EPO Board of Appeal revoked Bristol-Myers Squib's dasatinib patent in 2017, and discuss if and how innovators should adjust their filing and drafting strategy in light of the EPO's post-dasatinib approach to plausibility. [read post]
21 Jun 2011, 5:34 pm by Steve Hall
One test cited in Mathis' appeals put his IQ as low as 62, below the threshold of 70 considered by the courts to be the level for deciding mental impairment. [read post]
22 Jun 2011, 7:25 am by Kent Scheidegger
Court of Appeals noted:The evidence presented to the state trial court showed Mathis to have a low range of intelligence but all above the threshold for mental retardation. [read post]
24 Feb 2011, 4:15 am
Although Supreme Court thereafter granted the Correction Department’s motion to reargue its opposition to Mathis’ petition, it ultimately adhered to its prior decision.The Department appealed and the Appellate Division overturned Supreme Court’s ruling.First, the Appellate Division said that it agreed with the Department’s argument that at the time of his termination, Mathis was a probationary employee who could be terminated for “almost any… [read post]