Search for: "Mathis v. United States" Results 81 - 100 of 131
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Feb 2016, 12:00 am by The Public Employment Law Press
Whether the accommodation would impose an undue hardship on the employer will be determined at trial (Mathis v. [read post]
2 Feb 2016, 9:45 am by Lorene Park
Whether the accommodation would impose an undue hardship on the employer will be determined at trial (Mathis v. [read post]
26 Jan 2016, 4:15 pm by Immigration Prof
Cesar Cuauhtémoc García Hernández’s CrImmigration.com blog recently posted a helpful analysis of United States v. [read post]
26 Jan 2016, 6:10 am by Amy Howe
” At the Yale Journal on Regulation’s Notice and Comment, Daniel Hemel discusses United States v. [read post]
26 Dec 2014, 12:21 pm
Mathis, supra.As Wikipedia explains, the Confrontation Clause of the 6th Amendment to the United States Constitution provides that `in all criminal prosecutions, the accused shall enjoy the right . . . to be confronted with the witnesses against him. [read post]
21 Jul 2014, 7:34 pm by Brian Shiffrin
    In Mathis v United States (391 US 1 [1968]), the Court considered the applicability of Miranda to questioning of Mathis, a state prisoner, by an IRS agent regarding discrepancies in two of his federal tax returns, during which Mathis made incriminating statements that were later introduced at his criminal trial on charges of tax fraud. [read post]
29 Oct 2012, 10:37 am
 This concept used to exist under the United Kingdom's Trade Marks Act 1938; the Mathys Report on British Trade Mark Law and Practice, Cmnd 5601, May 1974, recommended scrapping it and it was indeed erased when the United Kingdom implemented the new, exciting norms of harmonised European national trade marks in its Trade Marks Act 1994. [read post]