Search for: "Matt Bouchard" Results 1 - 11 of 11
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Jun 2012, 6:00 am by Christopher G. Hill
For this week’s Guest Post Friday post here at Construction Law Musings, we welcome first time poster Matt Bouchard.  [read post]
26 Oct 2012, 6:00 am by Christopher G. Hill
For this week’s Guest Post Friday post here at Construction Law Musings, we welcome back Matt Bouchard.  [read post]
26 Oct 2012, 6:00 am by Christopher G. Hill
For this week’s Guest Post Friday post here at Construction Law Musings, we welcome back Matt Bouchard.  [read post]
31 Jan 2014, 6:00 am by Christopher G. Hill
For this week’s Guest Post Friday post here at Construction Law Musings, we welcome back Matt Bouchard. [read post]
10 Mar 2014, 6:00 am by Christopher G. Hill
A recent post by my fellow construction attorney Matt Bouchard (@mattbouchardesq) piqued my interest and started me thinking yet again. [read post]
29 Apr 2014, 7:10 am by Christopher G. Hill
A recent post by my friend, and fellow construction attorney, Matt Bouchard (@mattbouchardesq) points out that not only do you need certain terms in the contract, you need to have those terms clearly stated and well understood. [read post]
27 Feb 2014, 7:16 am by Christopher G. Hill
  The first is Matt Bouchard’s (@mattbouchardesq) post on forum selection and the interaction with various state statutes. [read post]
23 Oct 2013, 6:15 am by Christopher G. Hill
In doing so, I ran across two interesting posts, one from my pal Matt Bouchard (@mattbouchardesq) down in Raleigh, NC entitled “Mediator/Arbitrator Hybrids: The Next Big Thing in Construction Dispute Resolution. [read post]
11 Jun 2012, 6:58 am by Christopher G. Hill
The biggest stir seems to be from the Jacobs Engineering case discussed so ably by Matt Bouchard in last Friday’s Guest Post.  [read post]
28 Feb 2014, 5:57 am by Matt Bouchard
Matt Bouchard (@MattBouchardEsq) February 27, 2014 Whether you’re an architect or a prime contractor, you don’t have time to waste if you believe that a public procurement has been improperly administered. [read post]