Search for: "Matter of A.D" Results 61 - 80 of 1,114
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Dec 2011, 3:12 am
" The Courts indicated that the matter was not yet ripe for judicial consideration, commenting that if "the arbitrator's interpretation of the agreement may offend public policy, such a potential does not mandate a stay of arbitration. [read post]
7 Nov 2011, 3:07 am
Vindicating a personal right Cavanaugh v Board of Education of Huntington Union Free School District, 296 A.D.2d 369 The Cavanaugh decisions demonstrates the critical importance of filing a timely notice of claim when an individual plans to sue a school district concerning a matter solely involving his or her private interest. [read post]
12 Aug 2010, 11:35 pm
Apparently some of the material demanded concerned disciplinary matters while other papers dealt with a “stipulation of settlement. [read post]
30 Jan 2011, 8:01 pm
A recent decision from the Second Department of the Appellate Division in In Re Taylor 912N.Y.S.2d 651 (A.D.2 Dept 2010) reminds us of the burdens to be met by both sides in a judicial accounting. [read post]
2 Apr 2015, 3:34 pm by Stephen Bilkis
Contrary to ACS's contention, the deprivation of the right to counsel is a [29 A.D.3d 1016] fundamental error warranting reversal (see Matter of Otto v Otto, 26 AD3d 498 [2006]; Matter of Miranda v Vasquez, 14 AD3d 566 [2005]; Matter of Knight v Griffith, 13 AD3d 449 [2004]; Matter of Vladimir M., 206 AD2d 482, 483 [1994]; Matter of Williams v Williams, 91 AD2d 1044, 1045 [1983]). [read post]
29 Dec 2011, 3:20 am
City School District of the City of New York, 88 A.D.2d 907 A person serving as a hearing officer may be tempted to terminate or “shorten” a hearing because one or more of the participants becomes unruly or abusive. [read post]
27 Oct 2011, 3:27 am
Employee must resign “for good cause” to qualify for unemployment insurance benefitsQuintana v NYC Police Department, 297 A.D.2d 857 New York City probationary police officer Miguel A. [read post]
30 Apr 2011, 10:37 pm by Patty Salkin
The appellants failed to move for a preliminary injunction to preserve the status quo pending the appeal, and therefore the court said they failed to preserve their rights and the court dismissed the matter as academic. [read post]
22 Sep 2007, 7:23 pm by Damin J. Toell, Esq.
., 42 A.D.3d 277 (2d Dep't, 2007) to the Court of Appeals. [read post]