Search for: "Matter of Adoption of Indian Child" Results 41 - 60 of 170
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Nov 2013, 4:30 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
Because Autumn was of Chickasaw descent and thus an Indian child, the dependency proceeding fell within the provisions of the Indian Child Welfare Act, 25 U.S.C. section 1901, et seq. [read post]
22 Nov 2013, 4:30 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
Because Autumn was of Chickasaw descent and thus an Indian child, the dependency proceeding fell within the provisions of the Indian Child Welfare Act, 25 U.S.C. section 1901, et seq. [read post]
6 Jan 2015, 6:17 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
(S.B.C), and granting the Department of Public Health and Human Services, Child and Family Services Division (Child Services) permanent legal custody with right to consent to adoption. [read post]
9 Nov 2016, 7:50 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
(Indian Child Welfare Act – Termination of Parental Rights)Wells Fargo Bank v. [read post]
11 Oct 2013, 7:19 am by Jennifer Weisberg Millner
Second, there are complicated legal issues involved in any custody or adoption matter which goes across state lines. [read post]
15 Mar 2012, 4:48 pm
Other requirements include preferential placement with extended family, other tribe members, and other Indian families when deciding adoption cases. [read post]
11 Jul 2017, 9:55 am by Jeremy Morley
MorleyOn July 8, 2017 the Chief Justice of India, Hon’ble Shri Jagdish Singh Khehar, addressed the issue of India’s failure to sign the Hague Convention on the Civil Aspects of International Child Abduction, in a speech at an All India Seminar of the International Law Association.The Chief Justice sought to explain, and apparently to justify, India’s position by stating that it would be “disadvantageous to Indian women” for India to adopt the… [read post]
25 May 2017, 10:57 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
Zinke (Fiduciary Duty; Federal Recognition) State Courts Bulletinhttp://www.narf.org/nill/bulletins/state/2017.htmlIn the Matter of C.B.D. and P.M.P. [read post]
16 Nov 2018, 6:35 am by ilpc
The Court also holds that a lack of notice does not deprive the state court of subject matter jurisdiction, and that ICWA applies until it is determined the child is not an Indian child. [read post]
27 Oct 2015, 7:47 am by Kate Fort
Nor does BAF cite any binding authority for the propositions that the Guidelines are race-based, that birth parents have a fundamental right to dictate the adoptive placement of their child, that ICWA exceeds the Indian Commerce Clause, or that non-binding Guidelines may commandeer state entities. [read post]
17 Oct 2013, 2:01 pm by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
Instead of talking about a football team’s name, why aren’t we talking today instead about the role of religion in the Brown case or the disturbing revisionist trend some see in these custody and adoption cases, a trend exacerbated by the Supreme Court’s ruling, that enables non-Indian couples to get around the protections of the Child Welfare Act? [read post]
20 May 2013, 5:24 am by Kate Fort
Michigan’s practice of automatically proceeding as if the child is NOT an Indian child unless told otherwise by a tribe will eventually cause problems. [read post]
2 Feb 2016, 7:42 am by Kate Fort
In this case, the trial court ordered the Shoshone-Bannock Tribes to pay half of the cost of the child’s attorneys fees, sanctioned the Tribes for not turning over membership information in response to the adoptive couple’s motion to compel, barred the Tribes from presenting information on the child’s status as an Indian child, barred the Tribes from enrolling the child, and granted attorney’s fees request from the… [read post]
11 Jun 2020, 4:39 am by Guest
Continuing in the trend of preferring the European construction of the term, the UKSC then indicated in In the matter of B (A child) (2016) that at a given point in time, a person can have only one habitual residence – contrary to the previous exposition in Mark v. [read post]