Search for: "Matter of Adoption of Indian Child"
Results 121 - 140
of 251
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Jan 2017, 12:35 pm
Judge William H. [read post]
9 Nov 2016, 7:50 am
(Indian Child Welfare Act – Termination of Parental Rights)Wells Fargo Bank v. [read post]
8 Nov 2016, 1:57 pm
(Indian Child Welfare Act - Termination of Parental Rights) Wells Fargo Bank v. [read post]
24 Oct 2016, 6:25 pm
Poarch Band of Creek Indians Court: U.S. [read post]
2 Oct 2016, 4:32 pm
Second, it was reported that an Indian restaurant in Lancashire is to sue over a false claim on Facebook that a mouse had been found in one of its vegetable curries. [read post]
28 Sep 2016, 12:07 pm
This chapter deals with the Indian Child Welfare Act and Indian country justice. [read post]
13 Sep 2016, 6:42 am
Kristina contends the court and the Los Angeles County Department of Children and Family Services (Department) failed to comply with the inquiry and notice requirements of the Indian Child Welfare Act of 1978 (ICWA) (25 U.S.C. [read post]
24 Aug 2016, 5:50 am
Match an Indian child with a non-Indian foster or adoptive family. [read post]
19 Aug 2016, 10:16 am
Facts, in law, matter. [read post]
9 Aug 2016, 6:32 am
Kristen Carpenter has published “Indian Status Is Not Racial: Understanding ICWA as a Matter of Law and Practice” as part of the CATO Unbound series on the Indian Child Welfare Act. [read post]
30 Jul 2016, 7:50 pm
But the search of cell phones seized from his car was another matter. [read post]
25 Jul 2016, 4:05 am
As a matter of fact, you have got one-fourth in there. [read post]
14 Jun 2016, 5:00 am
Given its subject matter and intent, NACSA moved through Congress with little opposition and broad support. [read post]
29 May 2016, 10:02 pm
Small game animals were common meals when I was a child. [read post]
27 Apr 2016, 3:00 am
His Honour said that the State Act did not apply, because it was hardly relevant to the matter- when the child was born overseas.2016- in the Baby Gammy case, the judge said that the intended parents were not parents because the parenting presumption for a couple under the Family Law Act did not apply to surrogacy, but the State Act meant that the surrogate was a parent (and therefore so was her husband). [read post]
7 Apr 2016, 6:49 am
Baby Girl (parental rights under the Indian Child Welfare Act); AT&T Mobility v. [read post]
2 Feb 2016, 7:42 am
In this case, the trial court ordered the Shoshone-Bannock Tribes to pay half of the cost of the child’s attorneys fees, sanctioned the Tribes for not turning over membership information in response to the adoptive couple’s motion to compel, barred the Tribes from presenting information on the child’s status as an Indian child, barred the Tribes from enrolling the child, and granted attorney’s fees request from the… [read post]
10 Nov 2015, 8:05 am
The Houstons adopted Girven’s child, gave her money and spent social time with her. [read post]
27 Oct 2015, 7:47 am
Nor does BAF cite any binding authority for the propositions that the Guidelines are race-based, that birth parents have a fundamental right to dictate the adoptive placement of their child, that ICWA exceeds the Indian Commerce Clause, or that non-binding Guidelines may commandeer state entities. [read post]
9 Oct 2015, 12:15 pm
Belated congratulations to one-time relists Menominee Indian Tribe of Wisconsin v. [read post]
