Search for: "Matter of Adoption of Indian Child" Results 161 - 180 of 251
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Dec 2013, 8:38 am by Angelo A. Paparelli
 See, e.g., Matter of Douglas, 26 I&N Dec. 197 (BIA 2013)(child citizenship rights); Matter of E-S-I-, 26 I&N Dec. 136 (BIA 2013)(rights of incompetent respondents); and Matter of Lee (E-2 spouse's statutory right of employment authorization without need to apply for a work permit). [read post]
22 Nov 2013, 4:30 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
Because Autumn was of Chickasaw descent and thus an Indian child, the dependency proceeding fell within the provisions of the Indian Child Welfare Act, 25 U.S.C. section 1901, et seq. [read post]
22 Nov 2013, 4:30 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
Because Autumn was of Chickasaw descent and thus an Indian child, the dependency proceeding fell within the provisions of the Indian Child Welfare Act, 25 U.S.C. section 1901, et seq. [read post]
17 Oct 2013, 2:01 pm by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
Instead of talking about a football team’s name, why aren’t we talking today instead about the role of religion in the Brown case or the disturbing revisionist trend some see in these custody and adoption cases, a trend exacerbated by the Supreme Court’s ruling, that enables non-Indian couples to get around the protections of the Child Welfare Act? [read post]
11 Oct 2013, 7:19 am by Jennifer Weisberg Millner
Second, there are complicated legal issues involved in any custody or adoption matter which goes across state lines. [read post]
24 Sep 2013, 7:05 pm by Mary Dwyer
At its September 30, 2013 Conference, the Court will consider petitions seeking review of issues such as the termination of parental rights under the Indian Child Welfare Act, the constitutionality of Virginia’s “crimes against nature” statute, protections on free speech interests of government employees, and a free exercise challenge to workers’ compensation requirements. [read post]
24 Sep 2013, 11:41 am
But at the core of these disputes, is typically an innocent child who simply wants the matter to be worked out, and as quickly as possible. [read post]
25 Jul 2013, 9:01 am by National Indian Law Library
Baby Girl (Indian Child Welfare Act, best interests of the child)In the Matter of D.A. and M.A. [read post]
22 Jul 2013, 9:01 pm by Joanna L. Grossman
  More relevant to this case, the Act also made it more difficult to place a child for adoption with non-Indian parents. [read post]
17 Jul 2013, 3:42 pm by Gregory Forman
At issue on remand was whether the SouthCarolina Supreme Court should order the immediate adoption [as Adoptive Couple requested] or whether the matter should be remanded for a de novo hearing in the family court on the child’s current best interests [as Birth Father requested] taking into account that the child has lived with Birth Father since New Year’s Eve 2011. [read post]
9 Jul 2013, 5:48 pm
The court found that the federal law was not meant to apply to a custody dispute where an Indian child's adoption is lawfully and voluntarily initiated by a non-Indian parent with sole custody rights. [read post]
9 Jul 2013, 1:01 am by Jack Chin
Baby Girl (No. 12-399) that Congress likely did not have authority to enact the Indian Child Welfare Act, 25 U.S.C. [read post]
30 Jun 2013, 1:30 pm by Addie Rolnick
As a matter of federal Indian law, it was easy to support Dusten Brown and the Cherokee Nation in this case. [read post]
30 Jun 2013, 12:17 am by Addie Rolnick
This case has been shadowed by concerns about Indian authenticity, equal protection, fatherhood and motherhood, dysfunctional child welfare systems, and “deserving” adoptive parents. [read post]
29 Jun 2013, 12:04 am by Will Baude
After listening to the oral arguments in Adoptive Couple v. [read post]
27 Jun 2013, 10:21 am by Mark Ashton
Certainly, there is a long history of the United States government abstaining from involvement in cases involving child custody, divorce, support and adoption. * But, here, the United States was not attempting to pre-empt state law or otherwise undermine its effect. [read post]
27 Jun 2013, 9:07 am by Julie Ganz
  At issue in this case was the application of the Indian Child Welfare Act (“ICWA”) to a South Carolina Adoption Case. [read post]
26 Jun 2013, 11:35 am by Howard Wasserman
  The child identifies as an Indian, but is not a tribal citizen. [read post]
25 Jun 2013, 1:36 pm by Cicely Wilson
When an Indian parent abandons an Indian child before birth and that child has never been in that parent’s custody, the “breakup of the Indian family” has long since occurred, and section 1912(d) is inapplicable. [read post]