Search for: "Matter of Allen v Stanford" Results 1 - 20 of 53
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 May 2012, 6:42 am by Andrew Crank, Olswang LLP
(i) Stanford International Bank Limited (acting by its joint liquidators) (Appellant) v Director of the Serious Fraud Office (Respondent); and (ii) Stanford International Bank (acting by its joint liquidators) (Respondent) v The Director of the Serious Fraud Office (Appellant) (Oral Hearing)   Earlier this year, the Supreme Court  heard a complex dispute arising from the collapse of Stanford International Bank (“SIB”) in early… [read post]
23 Feb 2009, 12:02 pm
"I've been dealing with Stanford matters since December 2007," says O'Brien, who represents two of Stanford Group Co. [read post]
4 Jan 2010, 11:44 am by admin
(SIB), the cornerstone of Allen Stanford’s financial-empire-turned-Ponzi-scheme. [read post]
25 Jul 2012, 8:22 pm
Allen Stanford for the SEC to merit bringing an enforcement action or a referral to other agencies. [read post]
25 Jul 2012, 8:22 pm
Allen Stanford for the SEC to merit bringing an enforcement action or a referral to other agencies. [read post]
7 Oct 2013, 5:05 am by Allen Ferrell
Troice) involves state class action fraud litigation filed in the aftermath of Allen Stanford’s massive Ponzi scheme. [read post]
6 Nov 2009, 1:05 pm
Below, Stanford Law School's Tiffany Cartwright recaps Wednesday's oral argument in Wood v. [read post]
3 Jul 2015, 7:33 am by John Jascob
Allen Stanford operated a multi-billion dollar Ponzi-scheme for nearly two decades before it was discovered. [read post]
25 Jan 2018, 6:53 am by John Jascob
Troice (2014) where the court interpreted the Securities Litigation Uniform Standards Act in the context of certificates of deposit that were at the heart of the Allen Stanford Ponzi scheme. [read post]