Search for: "Matter of Baker v Poughkeepsie City School Dist." Results 1 - 11 of 11
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 May 2010, 6:13 pm
Appointing authority must be diligent in avoiding even the appearance of any personal involvement in making a disciplinary determinationMatter of Baker v Poughkeepsie City School Dist., 2010 NY Slip Op 04184, decided on May 11, 2010, Appellate Division, Second DepartmentThe Board of Education of the Poughkeepsie City School District, after receiving and adopting the findings and recommendations of a hearing officer,… [read post]
23 Mar 2012, 4:26 am
According to the decision, the Superintendent of Schools of the Poughkeepsie City School District preferred eight charges of "misconduct and/or incompetence" against Jeffrey Baker, the then Business Manager of the School District. [read post]
26 May 2022, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Dist., 125 AD3d at 1408-1409; Matter of Baker v Board of Educ., 29 AD3d at 575; Matter of Bryant v Board of Educ., Chenango Forks Cent. [read post]
26 May 2022, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Dist., 125 AD3d at 1408-1409; Matter of Baker v Board of Educ., 29 AD3d at 575; Matter of Bryant v Board of Educ., Chenango Forks Cent. [read post]
26 May 2022, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Dist., 125 AD3d at 1408-1409; Matter of Baker v Board of Educ., 29 AD3d at 575; Matter of Bryant v Board of Educ., Chenango Forks Cent. [read post]
26 May 2022, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Dist., 125 AD3d at 1408-1409; Matter of Baker v Board of Educ., 29 AD3d at 575; Matter of Bryant v Board of Educ., Chenango Forks Cent. [read post]
21 Dec 2018, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Dist., 2017 NY Slip Op 08385, Appellate Division, Second DepartmentIn this appeal from a disciplinary determination following a Civil Service Law §75 disciplinary hearing that resulted in the termination of the employee [Petitioner], the Petitioner challenged, among other things, the authority of the hearing officer to conduct the hearing.The Appellate Division said that the Board of Trustees of the Pound Ridge Library District's [Board] minutes reflecting a resolution to appoint… [read post]
21 Dec 2018, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Dist., 2017 NY Slip Op 08385, Appellate Division, Second DepartmentIn this appeal from a disciplinary determination following a Civil Service Law §75 disciplinary hearing that resulted in the termination of the employee [Petitioner], the Petitioner challenged, among other things, the authority of the hearing officer to conduct the hearing.The Appellate Division said that the Board of Trustees of the Pound Ridge Library District's [Board] minutes reflecting a resolution to appoint… [read post]
3 Jan 2019, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
**Other decision addressing "recusal" include the following:● A board member’s involvement in the disciplinary process does not automatically require recusal of that individual [Birch v County of Madison, 123 AD3d 1324]● Board members who reviewed the recommendations of the Hearing Officer and acted on the charges "were not so personally or extensively involved in the disciplinary process so as to compel the conclusion that they could not fairly consider the… [read post]
3 Jan 2019, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
**Other decision addressing "recusal" include the following:● A board member’s involvement in the disciplinary process does not automatically require recusal of that individual [Birch v County of Madison, 123 AD3d 1324]● Board members who reviewed the recommendations of the Hearing Officer and acted on the charges "were not so personally or extensively involved in the disciplinary process so as to compel the conclusion that they could not fairly consider the… [read post]
25 Jul 2012, 4:44 am
As to the role of the Town Supervisor in the proceeding and adjudication, the Appellate Division, citing Matter of Baker v Poughkeepsie City School Dist., 18 NY3d 714, noted that "Although '[i]nvolvement in the disciplinary process does not automatically require recusal,' . . . individuals 'who are personally or extensively involved in the disciplinary process should disqualify themselves from . . . acting on the… [read post]