Search for: "Matter of Brown v City of New York" Results 41 - 60 of 322
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Apr 2007, 1:21 am
City of New York RICHMOND COUNTYDamagesPlaintiff's Memory Failure, Mere Speculation As To Cause of His Fall Fatal to Damages Claim Rizzi v. [read post]
2 Aug 2023, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Operating Auth. posted on the Internet at https://www.nycourts.gov/reporter/3dseries/2023/2023_03893.htm and In the Matter of the Claim of Tracey Brown, Appellant, v New York City Transit Authority, Respondent. [read post]
2 Aug 2023, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Operating Auth. posted on the Internet at https://www.nycourts.gov/reporter/3dseries/2023/2023_03893.htm and In the Matter of the Claim of Tracey Brown, Appellant, v New York City Transit Authority, Respondent. [read post]
20 Oct 2011, 3:08 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Nonetheless, as the proponent of a motion for summary judgment, defendant had the initial burden of establishing his prima facie entitlement to judgment as a matter of law (see Winegrad v New York Univ. [read post]
27 Aug 2007, 3:00 am
Submitted by: Theodore Pollack, Senior Law Librarian, New York County Public Access Law Library. [read post]
5 Apr 2015, 3:52 pm by Stephen Bilkis
Moreover, the well established rule in New York is that constitutional provisions are presumptively self-executing (see Brown v State of New York, 89 NY2d 172, 186 [1996]). [read post]
7 Nov 2014, 7:02 am by The Public Employment Law Press
Recent ruling by the Appellate Division concerning alleged unlawful discriminationBrowne v Board of Educ, 2014 NY Slip Op 07465, Appellate Division, Second DepartmentMatter of Katz (Commissioner of Labor), 2014 NY Slip Op 07556, Appellate Division, Third DepartmentThe Browne decision:This decision by the Appellate Division illustrates the shifting of a party’s “burden of going forward” in litigating a complaint alleging unlawful discrimination.Robert… [read post]
11 Mar 2013, 5:23 pm by Rick Hills
The non-delegation argument is, on this reading of the opinion, largely a convenient vehicle with which to drive a non-textual, judge-made, anti-paternalism gloss into the Department of Health's otherwise unlimited statutory mandate to "regulate all matters affecting health in the city of New York" (City Charter section 556). [read post]