Search for: "Matter of Brown v New York City Health & Hosps. Corp."
Results 1 - 2
of 2
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Dec 2024, 5:28 am
Since the action has potential merit, and in light of the strong public policy favoring the resolution of actions on the merits and the lack of any prejudice to the defendants, the cross-motion to substitute the administrator of the estate of Charles Roe as a plaintiff in place of Charles Roe should have been granted (see Hemmings v Rolling Frito-Lay Sales, LP, 220 AD3d at 757; Petion v New York City Health & Hosps. [read post]
8 Sep 2022, 5:35 am
Indeed, the purpose of the New York Times v. [read post]
