Search for: "Matter of Cert. of a Question of Law"
Results 81 - 100
of 1,608
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Jun 2018, 6:31 am
Circuit law,” Bates concluded that the IFC is entitled to “virtually absolute immunity” under Atkinson. [read post]
15 Apr 2013, 7:59 pm
Hayes The Court also granted cert. on a second question: the effect of its 1954 decision, Castle v. [read post]
5 Dec 2008, 11:01 pm
"Again, the description of the exchange is accurate, but it's important to remember that the "valid excuse" question simply doesn't matter if the state rule is not neutral in its impact. [read post]
19 Dec 2019, 8:29 am
[the Baton Rouge Black Lives Matter case (in which Judge Don Willett has just switched to dissenting, and in which a cert. petition has been filed with the U.S. [read post]
26 Oct 2023, 2:31 pm
Every county that has a "bubble" law will vigorously enforce it until a cert petition is filed, then repeal it. [read post]
28 Feb 2012, 6:15 am
SCOTUS chickened out on addressing perhaps the most high-stakes question in constitutional law, which leaves the matter in the hands of the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals, and thereafter quite literally at the mercy of the Board of Pardons and Paroles and Gov. [read post]
15 Oct 2008, 4:07 am
Law Week's Supreme Court Today is reporting that the Supreme Court has granted certiorari in HIF Bio Inc. v. [read post]
5 May 2010, 11:52 am
Do either of those forms of diversity matter to the Court? [read post]
20 Apr 2020, 7:50 am
So if we say that, for our purposes, to qualify as a "question" or a "matter," the question or matter must be of the same significance or scope as "a lawsuit before a court," a person would understand that we are not talking about just any old question or matter; we are referring to only questions or matters on the same scale as "a lawsuit before a court. [read post]
4 Nov 2021, 5:20 am
In cert-denial opinions, however, justices frequently prejudge legal questions in ways that create serious impartiality problems in cases the court later accepts for review. [read post]
1 Jun 2023, 5:23 pm
Fundamentals always matter. [read post]
7 Jul 2019, 7:48 pm
")And so that ought to be the end of the matter, right? [read post]
9 Mar 2010, 11:56 am
Nelson, 512 F.3d 1134 (9th Cir. 2008), a case where NASA required employees to answer questions about very private matters. [read post]
7 Jun 2012, 12:02 am
The SG's brief asserted that the Hawaii Supreme Court decided the standing issue as a matter of state law, and thus was grounded in "independent and adquate" state law, meaning that it is immune from Supreme Court review under Michigan v. [read post]
29 Jun 2011, 3:22 pm
Here matters get trickier. [read post]
16 Jun 2010, 1:58 am
Supreme Court grants cert, there is always the question "why"? [read post]
19 Mar 2011, 7:02 am
Cir. 2009) (cert. granted Nov. 1, 2010). [read post]
12 Mar 2014, 7:25 am
Briefly: At Dorf on Law, Michael Dorf encourages the Court to “resolve as a matter of formal policy some of the questions that are now governed either by individual discretion or some loose sense of custom” – for example, the practice of providing a “courtesy” vote needed to stay an execution (which requires five votes) even if there are only four votes to grant review in the inmate’s case. [read post]
2 Feb 2011, 8:45 am
Microsoft Corp., 184 F.3d 1070 (9th Cir. 1999), cert. denied, 528 U.S. 1105 (2000). [read post]
17 May 2021, 4:00 pm
The QP matters. [read post]
