Search for: "Matter of Davis v Williams" Results 1 - 20 of 469
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Apr 2024, 9:05 pm by renholding
For many business economists and legal academics, the purpose of any business organization is simply stated: to maximize profits. [read post]
3 Feb 2024, 9:52 am by Marty Lederman
  The short version is that it’s a stone-cold loser, not least because it would have absurd ramifications (such as that it would mean Jefferson Davis would’ve been disqualified from serving in virtually any federal or state office except the presidency and vice-presidency, and that the Foreign Emoluments Clause wouldn’t prohibit the President, Vice-President, and members of Congress from accepting titles, offices, gifts or emoluments from foreign… [read post]
29 Jan 2024, 4:46 am by Franklin C. McRoberts
More than a dozen years ago, Peter Mahler wrote about one such case, Barasch v Williams Real Estate Co. (33 Misc 3d 1219[A] [Sup Ct, NY County 2011]). [read post]
9 Jan 2024, 9:01 pm by Josh Blackman
Here the article invoked the same reasoning used by Chief Justice Marshall in United States v. [read post]
4 Dec 2023, 3:06 pm by Aaron Moss
Music Matters One Song, Two Copyrights Trying to determine the public domain status of music can present another trap for the unwary. [read post]
7 Nov 2023, 10:25 am by Neil H. Buchanan
  Speaker Williams, who goes by his first name Rob, is often confused with Jim Miller, who has insisted that he is not in fact Speaker Steve Smith. [read post]
9 Oct 2023, 1:52 am by INFORRM
Surveillance 65 parliamentarians, including David Davis MP, Caroline Lucas MP, Baroness Shami Chakrabati, Joanna Cherry KC MP and Sir Ed Davey MP, have called for an immediate stop to the use of live facial recognition for surveillance purposes, Big Brother Watch reports. [read post]
22 Aug 2023, 10:46 am by Dennis Crouch
Hilton Davis Chemical Co., 520 U.S. 17 (1997). [read post]
14 Aug 2023, 5:36 am by Guest Author
It has provided virtually no guidance on what it means for a matter to present a “major question,” it has provided little guidance on what it means for a matter to present a “major question,” it has provided little guidance on the degree of statutory specificity necessary to provide agency authority over a major question . . . . [read post]