Search for: "Matter of Dunn"
Results 361 - 380
of 1,058
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Sep 2017, 4:32 am
I, No. 8 — via Four Peaks Advisors Manager Maude Dealing with Employee Theft: Tips and Actions to Take — via Evil HR Lady, Suzanne Lucas Communicating with Employees During a Crisis — via Next Blog What World Class HR Looks Like… — via The HR Capitalist, Kris Dunn Wage & Hour Fair Game? [read post]
25 Aug 2017, 6:04 am
Mirvis, Wachtell, Lipton, Rosen & Katz, on Tuesday, August 22, 2017 Tags: Business judgment rule, Controlling shareholders, Delaware cases, Delaware law, Fairness review, Merger litigation, Mergers & acquisitions ISS Releases Surveys for 2018 Policy Updates Posted by Elizabeth Ising and Maia Gez, Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP, on Wednesday, August 23, 2017 Tags: Board composition, Boards of Directors, Compensation… [read post]
24 Aug 2017, 9:01 pm
It is often (and rightly) said today that there are many people and forces working to divide America. [read post]
21 Aug 2017, 9:38 am
Dunn. [read post]
11 Aug 2017, 5:13 am
— via Troutman Sanders HR Law Matters Technology Will Facebook One Day Monitor Your Employees’ Mood? [read post]
10 Aug 2017, 6:09 am
Posted by Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP, on Thursday, August 10, 2017 Editor's Note: This post is based on a publication from Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP. [read post]
8 Aug 2017, 8:45 am
All arrestees, no matter their income, are presumed innocent. [read post]
4 Aug 2017, 4:20 am
Soto-Lopez, 476 U.S. 898, 903 (1986) (“A state law implicates the right to travel . . . when it uses ‘any classification which serves to penalize the exercise of that right.'” (quoting Dunn v. [read post]
4 Aug 2017, 4:20 am
Soto-Lopez, 476 U.S. 898, 903 (1986) (“A state law implicates the right to travel . . . when it uses ‘any classification which serves to penalize the exercise of that right.'” (quoting Dunn v. [read post]
1 Aug 2017, 8:59 am
In those circuits that have not recognized ascertainability as such, however, the need for minitrials still matters, and the defendant can make largely the same type of argument under Rule 23(b)(3), due process and the Rules Enabling Act. [read post]
1 Aug 2017, 8:59 am
In those circuits that have not recognized ascertainability as such, however, the need for minitrials still matters, and the defendant can make largely the same type of argument under Rule 23(b)(3), due process and the Rules Enabling Act. [read post]
28 Jul 2017, 6:00 am
Woody, Indiana University, on Friday, July 21, 2017 Tags: Disclosure, Management, Rule 10b-5, SEC, SEC enforcement, Securities enforcement, Securities fraud, Securities litigation, Supreme Court, U.S. federal courts Learnings from Some Recent Contested Cases Before the UK Takeover Panel Posted by Selina Sagayam, Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP, on Saturday, July 22, 2017 Tags: Antitakeover, International… [read post]
27 Jul 2017, 7:11 am
Linsley is a partner at Gibson Dunn & Crutcher LLP. [read post]
26 Jul 2017, 9:01 pm
As my former Yale Law School teacher Paul Kahn described what I see as the consensus pundit take on the matter a few days ago in an LA Times op-ed, “[t]o fire Mueller, Trump probably first would have to fire Rod Rosenstein, the deputy attorney general. [read post]
19 Jul 2017, 4:10 am
” Oodles of Pay Ratio Panels: Comprehensive Coverage It doesn’t matter whether you can make it to DC – because the October 17-18th Conference is available to watch online by video webcast, live on those specific days or by video archive at your convenience. [read post]
13 Jul 2017, 9:01 pm
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit (which handles federal intellectual property matters) struck down the statute on its face as violating the First Amendment. [read post]
29 Jun 2017, 9:01 pm
. because the matter was an intra-branch dispute between a subordinate and superior officer of the Executive Branch. [read post]
29 Jun 2017, 1:32 pm
Dunn. [read post]
29 Jun 2017, 11:07 am
Huston, who is Associate Attorney at Gibson Dunn & Crutcher LLP. [read post]
29 Jun 2017, 8:30 am
Dunn faulted colleagues for a “most unseemly maneuver” and “inexcusable departure from sound practice” that included denying Alabama a fair chance to brief the key issue. [read post]
