Search for: "Matter of Dunn" Results 481 - 500 of 1,055
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
31 Jul 2015, 4:45 am by Jon Hyman
— via Employment Matters Blog      Related StoriesWIRTW #376 (the “…I’ll only disappoint you…” edition)WIRTW #375 (the “post-it” edition)WIRTW #374 (the “bad choice” edition)  [read post]
28 Jul 2015, 3:31 am by INFORRM
’ (p.23) Positive and negative ‘market impact’ ‘Market impact’ brings us back, by definition, to the matter of the language of the market. [read post]
26 Jul 2015, 4:05 pm by INFORRM
The Washington Post discusses the matter here. [read post]
17 Jul 2015, 5:28 am
This post examines a recent opinion from the Court of Special Appeals of Maryland:  Baker v. [read post]
16 Jul 2015, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar
Before teaching, Professor Amar spent a few years at the firm of Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher.Follow @prof_amar on Twitter [read post]
12 Jul 2015, 4:10 pm by INFORRM
Next week in the courts On Monday 13 July 2015 the Upper Tribunal (Administrative Appeals Chamber) will hear the Information Commissioner’s appeal in the case of Colenso-Dunne v ICO. [read post]
10 Jul 2015, 4:06 pm by INFORRM
The Court held that, as a matter of EU law, the section 13 claim must include compensation for for distress (non-pecuniary loss, or general damages) and must not be confined to compensation for actual damage (pecuniary loss, or special damages). [read post]
7 Jul 2015, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar
Indeed, Justice Ginsburg went out of her way to decide the Arizona matter on the basis of a broad constitutional reading of “Legislature” in the Elections Clause, when she very well could have simply held that a congressional statute on the books authorized the Arizona voters to do what they did. [read post]
1 Jul 2015, 5:17 am
Specifically, he argues that, as a matter of law, the Commonwealth failed to prove that the value of the item stolen was $200 or more, and therefore, his conviction of grand larceny should be reversed and remanded for further proceedings. . . .Williams v. [read post]
30 Jun 2015, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar
So even if Texas were required to permit racial slurs on specialty plates (a matter about which I’m not sure – perhaps Texas, because of its history concerning race, has a strong interest in separating itself from any racist message that, if attributed to the state, might raise equal protection problems), the present case is different: the Confederate battle flag is worse in this regard than a racial slur; it is akin to a racial slur that was adopted and previously used as a… [read post]
26 Jun 2015, 4:25 am by Jon Hyman
— via The D & O Diary Gone, But Not Forgotten - A Deactivated Facebook Account Can Be Discoverable — via The National Law Review The Guide to Social Media and Securities Law — via Socially Aware Blog Why Fitbit Doesn’t Do a Damn Thing For Wellness — via The HR Capitalist, Kris Dunn The “E” in E-Mail stands for Exhibit. [read post]
Represented by the law firm Gibson Dunn & Crutcher LLP, NACD filed an amicus curiae (“friend-of-the-court”) brief in the matter of In re Rural/Metro, a complex case likely to continue throughout the summer. [read post]
19 Jun 2015, 2:44 pm by Joseph Fishkin
  In any event there is simply no plausible argument at all that such matters are relevant in any way to (2), let alone (3). [read post]
18 Jun 2015, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar
Her argument seems to be that because no individual—no matter how strong her objective credentials are—is “guaranteed” a slot under a holistic review admissions process, the disappointment Asians feel about being denied admission is a product of “misunderstandings [in Asian households] about how admission works at elite colleges[,]” rather than any fault in the admissions systems themselves. [read post]