Search for: "Matter of Farrell" Results 1 - 20 of 330
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Aug 2011, 5:18 pm by Steve Bainbridge
The right is a quite different matter – there are dense social ties between online partisans and anti-Muslim bigots and crazies claiming that universal dhimmidom is right around the corner. ... [read post]
8 Oct 2019, 8:49 am by fvanloon
They claim (falsely) the whistleblower law assures absolute anonymity, plus since the intelligence community is involved, that implies that all matters should be conducted behind closed doors. [read post]
13 Feb 2009, 2:01 am
Here's an interesting article about grammar in modern legal opinions by Professor Robert Farrell of Quinnipiac University Law School.From Law Librarian Blog. [read post]
10 Apr 2010, 4:39 pm by Ray
In Why Grammar Matters: Conjugating Verbs in Modern Legal Opinions, Prof. [read post]
3 Feb 2010, 1:19 pm by Tom Kosakowski
The Ombuds for students at Ryerson handled 586 matters and more than half involved academic issues. [read post]
6 Oct 2010, 5:00 am
Farrell's alleges that Kosama used key words and metatags associated with Farrell's to drive Internet traffic from Farrell's to the Kosama Web sites. [read post]
25 Oct 2012, 11:00 am by Tom Mighell
Health law is an important topic no matter where you happen to be, but at New York Health Law they are focusing on the issue primarily in the Empire State.   [read post]
9 Apr 2007, 11:40 am
Alongside Shakey's Pizza, which my family went to far more often, the nearby Farrell's was the dream place to eat.I always wondered what happened to the Farrell's, since I see them no longer. [read post]
28 Apr 2011, 3:11 pm by Eugene Volokh
(Eugene Volokh) So holds a New York appellate court in In the Matter of Robar v. [read post]
7 Jul 2011, 7:29 am by royblack
But no matter how far he fell, it still can’t eclipse his genius. [read post]
18 Nov 2014, 1:36 pm by Lawrence B. Ebert
The "reasonable to try" aspect of obviousness arose in the case:In re O’Farrell, 853 F.2d 894, 903–04 (Fed. [read post]
21 Apr 2014, 7:57 pm by Lawrence B. Ebert
As illustrated inIn re O’Farrell, 85 3 F.2d 894, 903 (Fed. [read post]
5 Aug 2013, 6:28 am
On appeal,  the defendants claim that the Appellate Court improperly concluded that the trial court abused its discretion in declining the request by the plaintiff, David Kervick, the executor of the estate of Ruth Farrell (decedent),  to poll the jury in order to determine whether any of the jurors had read an article concerning the subject matter of the case that was published in The New York Times (article) prior to trial. [read post]
16 Mar 2016, 1:12 pm
 The judge begins the opinion by explaining thatThis matter comes before the Court on defendant's Motion to Compel Discovery. [read post]
12 Jul 2013, 1:30 am
Accordingly, it ruled that the Commissioner’s determination must be annulled and remanded the matter for a new hearing. [read post]