Search for: "Matter of Figueroa v Figueroa" Results 1 - 20 of 84
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Mar 2009, 9:07 am
Stanford student Daniel Matro discusses last Wednesday’s argument in Flores-Figueroa v. [read post]
5 May 2009, 10:25 am
A Service from the ABA Criminal Justice Section, http://www.abanet.org/crimjust Flores-Figueroa v. [read post]
4 May 2009, 5:08 am
From this morning's opinion of the Court in Flores-Figueroa v. [read post]
15 Mar 2011, 11:35 am
Matter of Figueroa v Lewis 2011 NY Slip Op 01272 Decided on February 15, 2011 Appellate Division, Second Department The Second Department affirmed the family court’s denial, without a hearing, of father’s petition for modification of visitation. [read post]
3 Apr 2011, 12:35 pm
This point was cleared up by the United States Supreme Court case called Flores-Figueroa v. [read post]
7 Apr 2022, 12:28 pm by Cannabis Law Group
What makes the Figueroa case so noteworthy is that it’s the first time such a matter has made it to a federal appellate court. [read post]
7 May 2009, 8:01 am
Fans of adverbs — and of statutory interpretation — might be interested in the case of Flores-Figueroa v. [read post]
20 Mar 2015, 7:36 am by Kelly Buchanan
Ashby and Stribling, 38 U.S. 331 (1839): the Court analyzed Roman law in a matter concerning the bearing of risks in shipping contracts. [read post]
1 Jul 2015, 2:33 pm by Jon Sands
Ct. 2151 (2013), nor Flores-Figueroa v. [read post]
27 Aug 2009, 4:10 am
"The Department's Service Affidavit, however, set out when the award was mailed, but was is silent as to the pivotal matter of when it was "received" by Maye or her attorney. [read post]
1 Apr 2015, 1:00 am by Thaddeus Mason Pope, J.D., Ph.D.
She is currently co-counsel in Morris v NM, in which the lower court found a right of citizens in that state to make this choice as a fundamental constitutional right; the matter is now on appeal. [read post]
17 Feb 2012, 12:09 pm
  At which point "Attorney Figueroa responded, 'Wow,' presumably having forgotten the matter," and withdraws the request for an expert.Oops.This isn't an especially serious offense (in the scheme of things), but it is a felony. [read post]
17 Sep 2017, 4:09 pm by Stephen Bilkis
Harm or prejudice is proper when the party’s actions “were calculated to, or actually did defeat, impair, impede or prejudice the rights and remedies of the other party (Figueroa-Rolon v Torres 121 AD3d 684). [read post]