Search for: "Matter of Ghosh" Results 1 - 20 of 81
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Jan 2009, 11:52 pm
Shubha Ghosh (University of Wisconsin Law School) has posted Patenting Games: Or, Baker v. [read post]
The Supreme Court noted, obiter, that ‘the second leg of the test propounded in Ghosh does not correctly represent the law and that directions based upon it ought no longer to be given…The reasonableness or otherwise of his belief is a matter of evidence (often in practice determinative) going to whether he held the belief, but it is not an additional requirement that his belief must be reasonable’. [read post]
21 Feb 2012, 6:05 pm by Lawrence B. Ebert
Rao, Scientific Adviser to the Prime Minister of India is involved in a matter involving copying of text FROM a paper published in 2010 INTO a 2011 paper co-authored by Rao. [read post]
1 Aug 2019, 7:46 am by Jason Rantanen
  I asked Professor Ghosh to offer his views on the ACLU and Law Professors’ letter. [read post]
14 Nov 2017, 2:00 am by ELLIOT GOLD
The “reasonableness or otherwise” of the belief is a matter of evidence. [read post]
27 Jun 2008, 2:33 pm
All of this is a routine matter except that previous counsel met an early demise (called a suicide) under a commuter train. [read post]
9 Apr 2015, 7:20 am by Jason Rantanen
Shubha Ghosh is the Vilas Research Fellow & George Young Bascom Professor in Business Law at the University of Wisconsin Law School. [read post]
29 Jun 2010, 10:33 am by Dennis Crouch
Guest Post by Shubha Ghosh, Vilas Research Professor & Professor of Law at the University of Wisconsin Law School A year and a half ago, the Federal Circuit threw down a gauntlet in its Bilski opinion, extensively citing Supreme Court precedent to come up with the “machine or transformation test” to determine when a process constitutes patentable subject matter. [read post]
29 Sep 2014, 4:27 pm by Dennis Crouch
Guest post by Shubha Ghosh and Erika Ellyne This post compares and contrasts the United States approach to patentable subject after last term’s Alice v CLS decision, with that in the European Union. [read post]
12 Sep 2011, 7:00 am by Dennis Crouch
Congress could have added more certainty by removing abstract processes (e.g., a method of arbitration, hedging strategies) from patentable subject matter. [read post]
6 Feb 2024, 7:15 pm by Howard Bashman
” Online at Slate, Smita Ghosh has a Jurisprudence essay titled “There’s a Huge Originalist Hole in Trump’s Argument for Staying on the Ballot. [read post]
28 Jun 2010, 9:24 pm by Jacob Katz Cogan
Contents include:Arunabha Ghosh, Developing countries in the WTO Trade Policy Review MechanismEmanuela Ceva & Andrea Fracasso, Seeking mutual understanding: a discourse-theoretical analysis of the WTO Dispute Settlement SystemJoanne Gowa, Alliances, market power, and postwar trade: explaining the GATT/WTOBernard Hoekman, Will Martin, & Aaditya Mattoo, Conclude Doha: it matters! [read post]
8 May 2016, 6:24 pm by Dennis Crouch
  It was given jurisdiction to hear some non-patent matters when these matters are related to patent cases. [read post]
15 Oct 2021, 4:14 pm by INFORRM
The problem with the underlying business model In a report published a year ago, Dipayan Ghosh and I called this model the “business internet”. [read post]
When the casino refused to pay Mr Ivey his winnings, Mr Ivey launched a civil claim and thus the matter came before the courts. [read post]
31 Oct 2008, 1:29 pm
Focusing on IP policy here, I want to suggest that reaching the right result is not a matter of balance in the abstract, but in recognizing the practices affected by a legal rule and coming up with an approach that attempts to be the least disruptive to the broad set of practices that arguably tend to promote innovation. [read post]