Search for: "Matter of Herrera" Results 41 - 60 of 175
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Sep 2010, 1:15 pm by Susan Brenner
The Court of Appeals also noted that in his motion to suppress, Dixon argued that the evidence obtained from the cell phone should be excluded from the trial in this matter because Officer Shipley and Herrera searched the phone without Dixon's consent or a warrant . . . which suggests Dixon harbored an expectation that the contents of his cell phone would be free from searches conducted by governmental officials or others. . . . [read post]
2 Apr 2016, 8:50 am by Patrick McGinnis
Carriers and their lawyer cite the Hamilton1 case for the proposition that a nineteen-month delay in reporting a loss is, as a matter of law, not prompt and therefore prejudices the carrier from investigating the claim. [read post]
12 Feb 2017, 8:26 pm by Seyfarth Shaw LLP
The section provided that the arbitrator “shall be without authority to decide matters specifically excluded or not included in this Agreement. [read post]
15 May 2008, 5:57 pm
Some of the posts featured in today's update focus on that decision, while the rest deal with a broad range of other legal matters. [read post]
27 Apr 2010, 8:50 am by Judicial Watch Blog
He warned that the city attorney will likely encounter many legal problems since boycotting a state and every company that does business in it is an “extraordinarily complicated matter. [read post]
26 Jun 2019, 6:09 am
Still, the Mexican president, Andrés Manuel López Obrador, advised on Tuesday, June 18, 2019, that the government will produce a full official report on the matter and contemplate its next steps(here). [read post]
20 Mar 2008, 7:34 am
When the wall was put up, President Martin Torrijos appointed a commission to look into the matter and to come up with a resolution. [read post]
29 Dec 2016, 5:17 pm by Rick St. Hilaire
The board guides the Institute of Museum and Library Service director on policy matters and consists of 20 members of the general public. [read post]
3 Jun 2022, 4:30 am by Eric Segall
But the angriest and most upset I ever heard him was about an old concurring opinion by Justice Antonin Scalia in Herrera v. [read post]